Literature DB >> 18665703

Why people are reluctant to tempt fate.

Jane L Risen1, Thomas Gilovich.   

Abstract

The present research explored the belief that it is bad luck to "tempt fate." Studies 1 and 2 demonstrated that people do indeed have the intuition that actions that tempt fate increase the likelihood of negative outcomes. Studies 3-6 examined our claim that the intuition is due, in large part, to the combination of the automatic tendencies to attend to negative prospects and to use accessibility as a cue when judging likelihood. Study 3 demonstrated that negative outcomes are more accessible following actions that tempt fate than following actions that do not tempt fate. Studies 4 and 5 demonstrated that the heightened accessibility of negative outcomes mediates the elevated perceptions of likelihood. Finally, Study 6 examined the automatic nature of the underlying processes. The types of actions that are thought to tempt fate as well as the role of society and culture in shaping this magical belief are discussed. (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18665703     DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.2.293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  15 in total

1.  Magical thinking decreases across adulthood.

Authors:  Nadia M Brashier; Kristi S Multhaup
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2017-12

2.  Why Do People Believe What They Do? A Functionalist Perspective.

Authors:  Matthew Tyler Boden; Howard Berenbaum; James J Gross
Journal:  Rev Gen Psychol       Date:  2016-12-01

3.  Correlates of unrealistic risk beliefs in a nationally representative sample.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; William M P Klein; Richard P Moser; Mandi Yu; William R Waldron; Timothy S McNeel; Andrew N Freedman
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2010-11-26

4.  Lay beliefs about risk: relation to risk behaviors and to probabilistic risk perceptions.

Authors:  Kristen E Riley; Jennifer L Hay; Erika A Waters; Caitlin Biddle; Elizabeth Schofield; Yuelin Li; Heather Orom; Marc T Kiviniemi
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2019-05-15

5.  Effect of Superstitious Beliefs and Risk Intuitions on Genetic Test Decisions.

Authors:  Kristen E Riley; Andrew L Sussman; Elizabeth Schofield; Dolores D Guest; Yvonne T Dailey; Matthew R Schwartz; David B Buller; Keith Hunley; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Marianne Berwick; Jennifer L Hay
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Deliberative and intuitive risk perceptions as predictors of colorectal cancer screening over time.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hay; Marcel Ramos; Yuelin Li; Susan Holland; Debra Brennessel; M Margaret Kemeny
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-08-18

7.  Examining intuitive risk perceptions for cancer in diverse populations.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hay; Raymond Baser; Neil D Weinstein; Yuelin Li; Louis Primavera; M Margaret Kemeny
Journal:  Health Risk Soc       Date:  2014-01-01

8.  Challenges and suggestions for defining replication "success" when effects may be heterogeneous: Comment on Hedges and Schauer (2019).

Authors:  Maya B Mathur; Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2019-10

9.  "Don't know" responses to risk perception measures: implications for underserved populations.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Jennifer L Hay; Heather Orom; Marc T Kiviniemi; Bettina F Drake
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Cancer beliefs and patient activation in a diverse, multilingual primary care sample.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hay; Emily C Zabor; Julie Kumar; Debra Brennessel; Margaret M Kemeny; Erica I Lubetkin
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.