Literature DB >> 18665412

The effect of topical anesthesia on the rat electroretinogram.

Shai Sandalon1, Ron Ofri.   

Abstract

Topical anesthetics are recommended when electroretinograms (ERGs) are recorded using contact lens electrodes. However, these drugs act by blocking voltage-gated Na+ channels. Since such channels have been located in both the inner and outer retina of many species, topical anesthesia could affect the ERG recordings in these subjects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of oxybuprocaine, a commonly used ester local anesthetic, on the rat ERG. Full-field scotopic and pattern ERGs (PERGs) were recorded successively from both eyes of seven rats. One eye was randomly treated with oxybuprocaine 15 min prior to recording. In 10 rats unilateral full-field photopic ERG recordings were conducted prior to, and 15 min after, treatment. B-wave amplitude ratios of the experimental/control eyes were 1.13, 1.30, and 1.35 for the three intensities used to record scotopic ERG responses, and 1.04 for the photopic ERG responses. PERG amplitude ratios of the experimental/control eyes were 1.10, 1.21, 1.21, 1.24, and 1.26 for the five patterns used. Treatment had no significant negative effect on signal amplitude or implicit time of the full-field ERG or PERG. In fact, amplitudes of signals from treated eyes tended to be (insignificantly) higher, though this might reflect better position of the active electrode rather than a biological effect. We conclude that oxybuprocaine has no negative effect on the rat ERG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18665412     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-008-9141-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  25 in total

1.  Voltage-dependent Na(+) currents in mammalian retinal cone bipolar cells.

Authors:  Z H Pan; H J Hu
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Localization of origins of electroretinogram components by intraretinal recording in the intact cat eye.

Authors:  K T BROWN; T N WIESEL
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1961-09       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Standard for clinical electroretinography (2004 update).

Authors:  Michael F Marmor; Graham E Holder; Mathias W Seeliger; Shuichi Yamamoto
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 4.  Voltage-dependent conductances of solitary ganglion cells dissociated from the rat retina.

Authors:  S A Lipton; D L Tauck
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Monocarboxylate transporter expression remains unchanged during the development of diabetic retinal neuropathy in the rat.

Authors:  Christopher J Layton; Glyn Chidlow; Robert J Casson; John P M Wood; Mark Graham; Neville N Osborne
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Acetyl- and butyrylcholinesterase in normal and diabetic rat retina.

Authors:  G Sánchez-Chávez; R Salceda
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.996

7.  Cell sloughing with proparacaine.

Authors:  G Wilson; R J Fullard
Journal:  J Am Optom Assoc       Date:  1988-09

8.  Oxybuprocaine keratopathy: a preventable disease.

Authors:  E P Penna; K F Tabbara
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Metabolism of benoxinate in humans.

Authors:  F Kasuya; K Igarashi; M Fukui
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.534

10.  ISCEV standard for clinical pattern electroretinography--2007 update.

Authors:  Graham E Holder; Mitchell G Brigell; Marko Hawlina; Thomas Meigen; Michael Bach
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-04-14       Impact factor: 2.379

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effects of common anesthetics on eye movement and electroretinogram.

Authors:  Govind Nair; Moon Kim; Tsukasa Nagaoka; Darin E Olson; Peter M Thulé; Machelle T Pardue; Timothy Q Duong
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Consecutive unilateral recording of the two eyes affects dark-adapted ERG responses, when compared to simultaneous bilateral recording.

Authors:  Maya Ross; Hen Honig; Raaya Ezra-Elia; Eyal Banin; Alexey Obolensky; Edward Averbukh; Alexander Rosov; Elisha Gootwine; Ron Ofri
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Ocular manipulation reduces both ipsilateral and contralateral electroretinograms.

Authors:  Jasmine H Francis; David H Abramson; Brian P Marr; Scott E Brodie
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 2.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.