Literature DB >> 18665406

Chronologic analysis of symptomatic change following microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: value for predicting midterm outcome.

Jae Sung Park1, Doo-Sik Kong, Jeong-A Lee, Kwan Park.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study are to categorize the patterns of symptomatic change and to chronologically analyze them. From January 2004 to February 2006, microvascular decompression was performed on 236 consecutive patients. Follow-up time was at least over 1 year (mean, 17.1 months). We categorized the postoperative courses into five different groups according to the similarity of the temporal changes of the residual symptoms. The symptomatic change during each follow-up interval was chronologically analyzed among five different groups. The five improvement patterns included group A (immediate recovery without relapse), group B (temporary relapse followed by cure), group C (slow but steady improvement that leads to cure after one or more months), group D (recurrence with sustained symptoms), and group E (no improvement or improvement to some extent that does not lead to cure). The symptomatic change in the successful groups (groups A, B, and C) differed from that in the unsatisfactory groups (groups D and E), especially during the follow-up interval between postoperative 3 weeks and 3 months (p=0.014). This finding was true with (p=0.029) or without (p=0.015) the relapse curve. Therefore, we can predict the postoperative result as early as 3 months after the surgery. Overall cure rate in this series (93.2%) was nearly correspondent to the estimated cure rate at the first postoperative year (93.4%). Postoperative 3 months can be the most efficient and earliest time to predict the postoperative result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18665406     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-008-0150-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  15 in total

Review 1.  Microvascular decompression for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia, hemifacial spasm, and glossopharyngeal neuralgia: three surgical approach variations: technical note.

Authors:  Tsutomu Hitotsumatsu; Toshio Matsushima; Tooru Inoue
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 2.  Recurrence of hemifacial spasm after microvascular decompression.

Authors:  T D Payner; J M Tew
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Intraoperative management to prevent cerebrospinal fluid leakage after microvascular decompression: dural closure with a "plugging muscle" method.

Authors:  Jae Sung Park; Doo-Sik Kong; Jeong-A Lee; Kwan Park
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Etiology and definitive microsurgical treatment of hemifacial spasm. Operative techniques and results in 47 patients.

Authors:  P J Jannetta; M Abbasy; J C Maroon; F M Ramos; M S Albin
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Prognostic value of the lateral spread response for intraoperative electromyography monitoring of the facial musculature during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm.

Authors:  Doo-Sik Kong; Kwan Park; Byoung-Gook Shin; Jeong Ah Lee; Dong-Ok Eum
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Hemifacial spasm. Comparison of three different operative procedures in 110 patients.

Authors:  T Iwakuma; A Matsumoto; N Nakamura
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Microvascular decompression of cranial nerves: lessons learned after 4400 operations.

Authors:  M R McLaughlin; P J Jannetta; B L Clyde; B R Subach; C H Comey; D K Resnick
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Hemifacial spasm: endoscopic vascular decompression.

Authors:  J Magnan; F Caces; P Locatelli; A Chays
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 9.  Hemifacial spasm: a prospective long-term follow up of 83 cases treated by microvascular decompression at two neurosurgical centres in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  R D Illingworth; D G Porter; J Jakubowski
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm.

Authors:  F G Barker; P J Jannetta; D J Bissonette; P T Shields; M V Larkins; H D Jho
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  4 in total

1.  Microvascular decompression for treating hemifacial spasm: lessons learned from a prospective study of 1,174 operations.

Authors:  Seung-Jae Hyun; Doo-Sik Kong; Kwan Park
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  The value of lateral spread response monitoring in predicting the clinical outcome after microvascular decompression in hemifacial spasm: a prospective study on 100 patients.

Authors:  Ahmed El Damaty; Christian Rosenstengel; Marc Matthes; Joerg Baldauf; Henry W S Schroeder
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: long-term outcome and prognostic factors, with emphasis on delayed cure.

Authors:  Kwang Wook Jo; Doo-Sik Kong; Kwan Park
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Association Study of Apolipoprotein E Gene Polymorphism With Incidence and Delayed Resolution of Hemifacial Spasm.

Authors:  Jianxin Zhou; Li Jiang; Sangui Yuan; Jiashang Huang; Quanhong Shi; Yanfeng Xie; Bo Deng; Yan Zhan
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 4.003

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.