BACKGROUND: Circadian clocks are internal molecular time-keeping mechanisms that provide living organisms with the ability to adjust their growth and physiology and to anticipate diurnal environmental changes. Circadian clocks, without exception, respond to light and, in plants, light is the most potent and best characterized entraining stimulus. The capacity of plants to respond to light is achieved through a number of photo-perceptive proteins including cryptochromes and phytochromes. There is considerable experimental evidence demonstrating the roles of photoreceptors in providing light input to the clock. METHODOLOGY: In order to identify genes regulated by diurnal and circadian rhythms, and to establish possible functional relations between photoreceptors and the circadian clock in tomato, we monitored the temporal transcription pattern in plants entrained to long-day conditions, either by large scale comparative profiling, or using a focused approach over a number of photosensory and clock-related genes by QRT-PCR. In parallel, focused transcription analyses were performed in cry1a- and in CRY2-OX tomato genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: We report a large series of transcript oscillations that shed light on the complex network of interactions among tomato photoreceptors and clock-related genes. Alteration of cryptochrome gene expression induced major changes in the rhythmic oscillations of several other gene transcripts. In particular, over-expression of CRY2 had an impact not only on day/night fluctuations but also on rhythmicity under constant light conditions. Evidence was found for widespread diurnal oscillations of transcripts encoding specific enzyme classes (e.g. carotenoid biosynthesis enzymes) as well as for post-transcriptional diurnal and circadian regulation of the CRY2 transcript.
BACKGROUND: Circadian clocks are internal molecular time-keeping mechanisms that provide living organisms with the ability to adjust their growth and physiology and to anticipate diurnal environmental changes. Circadian clocks, without exception, respond to light and, in plants, light is the most potent and best characterized entraining stimulus. The capacity of plants to respond to light is achieved through a number of photo-perceptive proteins including cryptochromes and phytochromes. There is considerable experimental evidence demonstrating the roles of photoreceptors in providing light input to the clock. METHODOLOGY: In order to identify genes regulated by diurnal and circadian rhythms, and to establish possible functional relations between photoreceptors and the circadian clock in tomato, we monitored the temporal transcription pattern in plants entrained to long-day conditions, either by large scale comparative profiling, or using a focused approach over a number of photosensory and clock-related genes by QRT-PCR. In parallel, focused transcription analyses were performed in cry1a- and in CRY2-OX tomato genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: We report a large series of transcript oscillations that shed light on the complex network of interactions among tomato photoreceptors and clock-related genes. Alteration of cryptochrome gene expression induced major changes in the rhythmic oscillations of several other gene transcripts. In particular, over-expression of CRY2 had an impact not only on day/night fluctuations but also on rhythmicity under constant light conditions. Evidence was found for widespread diurnal oscillations of transcripts encoding specific enzyme classes (e.g. carotenoid biosynthesis enzymes) as well as for post-transcriptional diurnal and circadian regulation of the CRY2 transcript.
Authors: J W Reed; P Nagpal; R M Bastow; K S Solomon; M J Dowson-Day; R P Elumalai; A J Millar Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: James C W Locke; László Kozma-Bognár; Peter D Gould; Balázs Fehér; Eva Kevei; Ferenc Nagy; Matthew S Turner; Anthony Hall; Andrew J Millar Journal: Mol Syst Biol Date: 2006-11-14 Impact factor: 11.429
Authors: Sophia H Aldous; Sean E Weise; Thomas D Sharkey; Daniel M Waldera-Lupa; Kai Stühler; Julia Mallmann; Georg Groth; Udo Gowik; Peter Westhoff; Borjana Arsova Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2014-05-21 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Elio Fantini; Maria Sulli; Lei Zhang; Giuseppe Aprea; José M Jiménez-Gómez; Abdelhafid Bendahmane; Gaetano Perrotta; Giovanni Giuliano; Paolo Facella Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2018-12-12 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Anna Zdepski; Wenqin Wang; Henry D Priest; Faraz Ali; Maqsudul Alam; Todd C Mockler; Todd P Michael Journal: Trop Plant Biol Date: 2008-12-16 Impact factor: 1.512
Authors: Kevin R Hayes; Mary Beatty; Xin Meng; Carl R Simmons; Jeffrey E Habben; Olga N Danilevskaya Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-09-23 Impact factor: 3.240