BACKGROUND: A rapid scaling up of HIV interventions in India is anticipated, but systematic information on how costs of HIV interventions change over time and programme scale is not available to inform planning. METHODS: We studied the changes in unit costs of two major interventions, voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) and sex worker programmes in the south Indian state of Andhra Pradesh between 2002-2003 and 2005-2006 fiscal years. Economic costs (from the provider perspective) and output data from 17 publicly funded VCT centers and 14 sex worker programmes were collected using standardized methods. We calculated unit costs for each programme in each period and explored possible reasons for the changes seen. RESULTS: In 2005-2006, the VCT centers served 66 445 clients and the sex worker programmes served 32 550. The unit cost of providing VCT dropped over 3 years by half to Indian Rupees (INR) 147.5 (US$3.33) mainly because the number of clients doubled. There was no decrease in the average time spent counseling each client. The unit cost of providing services to sex workers increased 2.4 times over 3 years to INR 1401 (US$31.6) as a result of increases in male condom distribution, staff salaries and training, and treatment for sexually transmitted infections, all suggesting improved services. CONCLUSION: The unit cost of these two interventions changed dramatically over a 3-year period, but in opposite directions. The current unit cost for VCT in Andhra Pradesh is much lower than the estimated global average for low-income settings. These local longitudinal cost data are useful to inform the currently planned scaling up of HIV interventions in India.
BACKGROUND: A rapid scaling up of HIV interventions in India is anticipated, but systematic information on how costs of HIV interventions change over time and programme scale is not available to inform planning. METHODS: We studied the changes in unit costs of two major interventions, voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) and sex worker programmes in the south Indian state of Andhra Pradesh between 2002-2003 and 2005-2006 fiscal years. Economic costs (from the provider perspective) and output data from 17 publicly funded VCT centers and 14 sex worker programmes were collected using standardized methods. We calculated unit costs for each programme in each period and explored possible reasons for the changes seen. RESULTS: In 2005-2006, the VCT centers served 66 445 clients and the sex worker programmes served 32 550. The unit cost of providing VCT dropped over 3 years by half to Indian Rupees (INR) 147.5 (US$3.33) mainly because the number of clients doubled. There was no decrease in the average time spent counseling each client. The unit cost of providing services to sex workers increased 2.4 times over 3 years to INR 1401 (US$31.6) as a result of increases in male condom distribution, staff salaries and training, and treatment for sexually transmitted infections, all suggesting improved services. CONCLUSION: The unit cost of these two interventions changed dramatically over a 3-year period, but in opposite directions. The current unit cost for VCT in Andhra Pradesh is much lower than the estimated global average for low-income settings. These local longitudinal cost data are useful to inform the currently planned scaling up of HIV interventions in India.
Authors: L Dandona; P Sisodia; Y K Ramesh; S G P Kumar; A A Kumar; M C Rao; M Someshwar; B Hansl; N Marshall; E Marseille; J G Kahn Journal: Natl Med J India Date: 2005 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 0.537
Authors: Lorna Guinness; Lilani Kumaranayake; Bhuvaneswari Rajaraman; Girija Sankaranarayanan; Gangadhar Vannela; P Raghupathi; Alex George Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2005-11-10 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: John Stover; Stefano Bertozzi; Juan-Pablo Gutierrez; Neff Walker; Karen A Stanecki; Robert Greener; Eleanor Gouws; Catherine Hankins; Geoff P Garnett; Joshua A Salomon; J Ties Boerma; Paul De Lay; Peter D Ghys Journal: Science Date: 2006-02-02 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Lalit Dandona; Pratap Sisodia; T L N Prasad; Elliot Marseille; M Chalapathi Rao; A Anod Kumar; S G Prem Kumar; Y K Ramesh; Mead Over; M Someshwar; James G Kahn Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2005-11-05 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Lalit Dandona; Pratap Sisodia; S G Prem Kumar; Y K Ramesh; A Anod Kumar; M Chalapathi Rao; Elliot Marseille; M Someshwar; Nell Marshall; James G Kahn Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2005-09-24 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Isaac C-H Fung; Lorna Guinness; Peter Vickerman; Charlotte Watts; Gangadhar Vannela; Jagdish Vadhvana; Anna M Foss; Laxman Malodia; Meena Gandhi; Gaurang Jani Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2007-08-06 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Elliot Marseille; Lalit Dandona; Nell Marshall; Paul Gaist; Sergio Bautista-Arredondo; Brandi Rollins; Stefano M Bertozzi; Jerry Coovadia; Joseph Saba; Dmitry Lioznov; Jo-Ann Du Plessis; Evgeny Krupitsky; Nicci Stanley; Mead Over; Alena Peryshkina; S G Prem Kumar; Sowedi Muyingo; Christian Pitter; Mattias Lundberg; James G Kahn Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2007-07-12 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Mariana Siapka; Michelle Remme; Carol Dayo Obure; Claudia B Maier; Karl L Dehne; Anna Vassall Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2014-04-01 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Kartik K Venkatesh; Jessica E Becker; Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy; Yoriko M Nakamura; Kenneth H Mayer; Elena Losina; Soumya Swaminathan; Timothy P Flanigan; Rochelle P Walensky; Kenneth A Freedberg Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-05-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Rabiah Al Adawiyah; Olga P M Saweri; David C Boettiger; Tanya L Applegate; Ari Probandari; Rebecca Guy; Lorna Guinness; Virginia Wiseman Journal: Health Policy Plan Date: 2021-06-25 Impact factor: 3.344
Authors: Marc d'Elbée; Gabriela B Gomez; Linda Alinafe Sande; Lawrence Mwenge; Collin Mangenah; Cheryl Johnson; Graham F Medley; Melissa Neuman; Karin Hatzold; Elizabeth Lucy Corbett; Gesine Meyer-Rath; Fern Terris-Prestholt Journal: BMJ Glob Health Date: 2021-07