OBJECTIVES: Current indications for therapeutic hypothermia (TH) are restricted to comatose patients with cardiac arrest (CA) due to ventricular fibrillation (VF) and without circulatory shock. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the benefit of this treatment in more heterogeneous groups of patients, including those with non-VF rhythms and/or shock and to identify early predictors of outcome in this setting. DESIGN: Prospective study, from December 2004 to October 2006. SETTING: 32-bed medico-surgical intensive care unit, university hospital. PATIENTS: Comatose patients with out-of-hospital CA. INTERVENTIONS: TH to 33 +/- 1 degrees C (external cooling, 24 hrs) was administered to patients resuscitated from CA due to VF and non-VF (including asystole or pulseless electrical activity), independently from the presence of shock. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We hypothesized that simple clinical criteria available on hospital admission (initial arrest rhythm, duration of CA, and presence of shock) might help to identify patients who eventually survive and might most benefit from TH. For this purpose, outcome was related to these predefined variables. Seventy-four patients (VF 38, non-VF 36) were included; 46% had circulatory shock. Median duration of CA (time from collapse to return of spontaneous circulation [ROSC]) was 25 mins. Overall survival was 39.2%. However, only 3.1% of patients with time to ROSC > 25 mins survived, as compared to 65.7% with time to ROSC < or = 25 mins. Using a logistic regression analysis, time from collapse to ROSC, but not initial arrest rhythm or presence of shock, independently predicted survival at hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Time from collapse to ROSC is strongly associated with outcome following VF and non-VF cardiac arrest treated with therapeutic hypothermia and could therefore be helpful to identify patients who benefit most from active induced cooling.
OBJECTIVES: Current indications for therapeutic hypothermia (TH) are restricted to comatosepatients with cardiac arrest (CA) due to ventricular fibrillation (VF) and without circulatory shock. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the benefit of this treatment in more heterogeneous groups of patients, including those with non-VF rhythms and/or shock and to identify early predictors of outcome in this setting. DESIGN: Prospective study, from December 2004 to October 2006. SETTING: 32-bed medico-surgical intensive care unit, university hospital. PATIENTS: Comatosepatients with out-of-hospital CA. INTERVENTIONS: TH to 33 +/- 1 degrees C (external cooling, 24 hrs) was administered to patients resuscitated from CA due to VF and non-VF (including asystole or pulseless electrical activity), independently from the presence of shock. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We hypothesized that simple clinical criteria available on hospital admission (initial arrest rhythm, duration of CA, and presence of shock) might help to identify patients who eventually survive and might most benefit from TH. For this purpose, outcome was related to these predefined variables. Seventy-four patients (VF 38, non-VF 36) were included; 46% had circulatory shock. Median duration of CA (time from collapse to return of spontaneous circulation [ROSC]) was 25 mins. Overall survival was 39.2%. However, only 3.1% of patients with time to ROSC > 25 mins survived, as compared to 65.7% with time to ROSC < or = 25 mins. Using a logistic regression analysis, time from collapse to ROSC, but not initial arrest rhythm or presence of shock, independently predicted survival at hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Time from collapse to ROSC is strongly associated with outcome following VF and non-VF cardiac arrest treated with therapeutic hypothermia and could therefore be helpful to identify patients who benefit most from active induced cooling.
Authors: Laurence M Katz; Jonathan E Frank; Lawrence T Glickman; Gerald McGwin; Brice H Lambert; Christopher J Gordon Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2015-04-20 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Patrick Meybohm; Matthias Gruenewald; Kai D Zacharowski; Martin Albrecht; Ralph Lucius; Nikola Fösel; Johannes Hensler; Karina Zitta; Berthold Bein Journal: Crit Care Date: 2010-02-16 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Creighton W Don; W T Longstreth; Charles Maynard; Michele Olsufka; Graham Nichol; Todd Ray; Nicole Kupchik; Steven Deem; Michael K Copass; Leonard A Cobb; Francis Kim Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Patrick Meybohm; Matthias Gruenewald; Martin Albrecht; Kai D Zacharowski; Ralph Lucius; Karina Zitta; Alexander Koch; Nguyen Tran; Jens Scholz; Berthold Bein Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-10-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alexander W den Hartog; Anne-Cornélie J M de Pont; Laure B M Robillard; Jan M Binnekade; Marcus J Schultz; Janneke Horn Journal: Crit Care Date: 2010-06-23 Impact factor: 9.097