Literature DB >> 18664700

Measurement of phonated intervals during four fluency-inducing conditions.

Jason H Davidow1, Anne K Bothe, Richard D Andreatta, Jun Ye.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Previous investigations of persons who stutter have demonstrated changes in vocalization variables during fluency-inducing conditions (FICs). A series of studies has also shown that a reduction in short intervals of phonation, those from 30 to 200 ms, is associated with decreased stuttering. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to test the hypothesis that the distribution of phonated intervals (PIs) should change during 4 of the most well-known FICs.
METHOD: A repeated-measures design was used to explore the relationship between PIs and stuttering during 4 FICs: chorus reading, prolonged speech, singing, and rhythmic stimulation. Most conditions were conducted at 2 different speech rates. The distribution of PIs was measured during these conditions and was compared with PI distributions obtained during control conditions.
RESULTS: Overall PI distributions were significantly different during all 4 FICs, as compared with control conditions. PIs in the range of 30-150 ms were reduced across all FICs, at all speech rates.
CONCLUSION: These results provide further evidence of the importance of phonation variables to (a) our understanding of how FICs may operate and (b) the treatment of stuttering. These findings, along with previous studies that showed how purposefully reducing the number of short PIs resulted in the elimination of stuttering, suggest that treatment programs based on prolonged speech-or PIs, in particular-may benefit from emphasizing a reduction in the number of short PIs and a simultaneous increase in the number of longer PIs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18664700     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0040)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  7 in total

1.  Measurement of speech effort during fluency-inducing conditions in adults who do and do not stutter.

Authors:  Roger J Ingham; Anne K Bothe; Erin Jang; Lauren Yates; John Cotton; Irene Seybold
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Efficacy of the Modifying Phonation Intervals (MPI) Stuttering Treatment Program With Adults Who Stutter.

Authors:  Roger J Ingham; Janis C Ingham; Anne K Bothe; Yuedong Wang; Martin Kilgo
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.408

3.  Phonation interval modification and speech performance quality during fluency-inducing conditions by adults who stutter.

Authors:  Roger J Ingham; Anne K Bothe; Yuedong Wang; Krystal Purkhiser; Anneliese New
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 2.288

4.  Systematic studies of modified vocalization: speech production changes during a variation of metronomic speech in persons who do and do not stutter.

Authors:  Jason H Davidow; Anne K Bothe; Jun Ye
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.538

5.  Overreliance on auditory feedback may lead to sound/syllable repetitions: simulations of stuttering and fluency-inducing conditions with a neural model of speech production.

Authors:  Oren Civier; Stephen M Tasko; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 2.538

6.  The Therapeutic Effects of Singing in Neurological Disorders.

Authors:  Catherine Y Wan; Theodor Rüber; Anja Hohmann; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  Music Percept       Date:  2010-04-01

7.  Systematic studies of modified vocalization: the effect of speech rate on speech production measures during metronome-paced speech in persons who stutter.

Authors:  Jason H Davidow
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 3.020

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.