Literature DB >> 18664435

Multiple gossip statements and their effect on reputation and trustworthiness.

Ralf D Sommerfeld1, Hans-Jürgen Krambeck, Manfred Milinski.   

Abstract

Empirical and theoretical evidence from various disciplines indicates that reputation, reputation building and trust are important for human cooperation, social behaviour and economic progress. Recently, it has been shown that reputation gained in games of indirect reciprocity can be transmitted by gossip. But it has also been shown that gossiping has a strong manipulative potential. We propose that this manipulative potential is alleviated by the abundance of gossip. Multiple gossip statements give a better picture of the actual behaviour of a person, and thus inaccurate or fake gossip has little power as long as it is in the minority. In addition, we investigate the supposedly strong connection between reciprocity, reputation and trust. The results of this experimental study (with 11 groups of 12 students each) document that gossip quantity helps to direct cooperation towards cooperators. Moreover, reciprocity, trust and reputations transferred via gossip are positively correlated. This interrelation might have helped to reach the high levels of cooperation that can be observed in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18664435      PMCID: PMC2603203          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  17 in total

1.  Cooperation through image scoring in humans.

Authors:  C Wedekind; M Milinski
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-05-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity.

Authors:  Martin A Nowak; Karl Sigmund
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Getting to know you: reputation and trust in a two-person economic exchange.

Authors:  Brooks King-Casas; Damon Tomlin; Cedric Anen; Colin F Camerer; Steven R Quartz; P Read Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The leading eight: social norms that can maintain cooperation by indirect reciprocity.

Authors:  Hisashi Ohtsuki; Yoh Iwasa
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  Impact of fraud on the mean-field dynamics of cooperative social systems.

Authors:  Torsten Röhl; Claudia Röhl; Heinz Georg Schuster; Arne Traulsen
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2007-08-27

6.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring.

Authors:  M A Nowak; K Sigmund
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-06-11       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Psychological adaptations for assessing gossip veracity.

Authors:  Nicole H Hess; Edward H Hagen
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2006-09

8.  Evolution of direct and indirect reciprocity.

Authors:  Gilbert Roberts
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.

Authors:  R F Baumeister; M R Leary
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  A comparison of naïve and sophisticated subject behavior with game theoretic predictions.

Authors:  K A McCabe; V L Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  23 in total

1.  The interplay of cognition and cooperation.

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan; Lucie Salwiczek; Redouan Bshary
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect.

Authors:  Jan Lorenz; Heiko Rauhut; Frank Schweitzer; Dirk Helbing
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The emergence and selection of reputation systems that drive cooperative behaviour.

Authors:  Alain Schlaepfer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  How is human cooperation different?

Authors:  Alicia P Melis; Dirk Semmann
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Deterrence and transmission as mechanisms ensuring reliability of gossip.

Authors:  Francesca Giardini
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2011-10-09

6.  Personal experience and reputation interact in human decisions to help reciprocally.

Authors:  Lucas Molleman; Eva van den Broek; Martijn Egas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  When does reputation lie? Dynamic feedbacks between costly signals, social capital and social prominence.

Authors:  Marion Dumas; Jessica L Barker; Eleanor A Power
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Negative Gossip Decreases Targets' Organizational Citizenship Behavior by Decreasing Social Inclusion. A Multi-Method Approach.

Authors:  Elena Martinescu; Wiebren Jansen; Bianca Beersma
Journal:  Group Organ Manag       Date:  2021-01-26

9.  Dynamical models explaining social balance and evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  Vincent Antonio Traag; Paul Van Dooren; Patrick De Leenheer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Why humans might help strangers.

Authors:  Nichola J Raihani; Redouan Bshary
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.