Literature DB >> 18663742

Which cranial regions reflect molecular distances reliably in humans? Evidence from three-dimensional morphology.

Heather F Smith1.   

Abstract

Knowledge of the degree to which various subsets of morphological data reflect molecular relationships is crucial for studies attempting to estimate genetic relationships from patterns of morphological variation. This study assessed the phylogenetic utility of six different human cranial regions, plus the entire cranium. Three-dimensional landmark data were collected for 83 landmarks from samples of skulls from 14 modern human populations. The data were subsequently divided into anatomical regions: basicranium, upper face, mandible, temporal bone, upper jaw, cranial vault, and a subset of points from around the entire cranium. Depictions of population molecular distances were calculated using published data on microsatellites for the same or closely related populations. Distances based on morphological variation of each of the anatomical regions were compared with molecular distances, and the correlations assessed. The morphology of the basicranium, temporal bone, upper face, and entire cranium demonstrated the highest correlations with molecular distances. The morphology of the mandible, upper jaw, and cranial vault, as measured here, were not significantly correlated with molecular distances. As the three-dimensional morphology of the temporal bone, upper face, basicranium, and entire cranium appear to consistently reflect genetic relationships in humans, especially with more reliability than the cranial vault, it would be preferable to focus on these regions when attempting to determine the genetic relationships of human specimens with no molecular data. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18663742     DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.20805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Biol        ISSN: 1042-0533            Impact factor:   1.937


  28 in total

1.  Global human mandibular variation reflects differences in agricultural and hunter-gatherer subsistence strategies.

Authors:  Noreen von Cramon-Taubadel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Changes in human skull morphology across the agricultural transition are consistent with softer diets in preindustrial farming groups.

Authors:  David C Katz; Mark N Grote; Timothy D Weaver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Genetic and environmental contributions to variation in baboon cranial morphology.

Authors:  Charles C Roseman; Katherine E Willmore; Jeffrey Rogers; Charles Hildebolt; Brooke E Sadler; Joan T Richtsmeier; James M Cheverud
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.868

4.  Using CRANID to test the population affinity of known crania.

Authors:  Lauren Kallenberger; Varsha Pilbrow
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Test of age-related variation in the craniometry of the adult human foramen magnum region: implications for sex determination methods.

Authors:  René Gapert; Sue Black; Jason Last
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2013-04-14       Impact factor: 2.007

6.  Measuring the effects of farming on human skull morphology.

Authors:  Noreen von Cramon-Taubadel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Testing the utility of dental morphological trait combinations for inferring human neutral genetic variation.

Authors:  Hannes Rathmann; Hugo Reyes-Centeno
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Skull and limb morphology differentially track population history and environmental factors in the transition to agriculture in Europe.

Authors:  Noreen von Cramon-Taubadel; Jay T Stock; Ron Pinhasi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Detecting Phylogenetic Signal and Adaptation in Papionin Cranial Shape by Decomposing Variation at Different Spatial Scales.

Authors:  Nicole D S Grunstra; Silvester J Bartsch; Anne Le Maître; Philipp Mitteroecker
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 15.683

10.  Craniometric data supports demic diffusion model for the spread of agriculture into Europe.

Authors:  Ron Pinhasi; Noreen von Cramon-Taubadel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.