Literature DB >> 18663595

Animal pharming, two decades on.

Alexander Kind1, Angelika Schnieke.   

Abstract

Since its inception 20 years ago, the animal pharming industry has promoted transgenic animals as a cost-effective method of biopharmaceutical production. However, it took until 2006 for the first therapeutic product to gain regulatory approval. This was an important milestone, but scepticism still abounds. Can pharming regain investor confidence, and will society accept transgenic livestock as a production method? There is some cause for optimism, biopharmaceuticals are a large, expanding market and animal pharming has already made considerable strides. A novel production platform has been established, groundbreaking technologies developed, a necessary regulatory framework put in place. Nevertheless, despite cost advantages, pharming has become a niche production method and its long term success may depend on products unique to transgenic animals.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18663595     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-008-9206-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  38 in total

Review 1.  Process economics of industrial monoclonal antibody manufacture.

Authors:  Suzanne S Farid
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 3.205

2.  Biopharmaceutical benchmarks 2006.

Authors:  Gary Walsh
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Transgenesis sunny-side up.

Authors:  Helen Sang
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  The farmyard drug store.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Rate limitations in posttranslational processing by the mammary gland of transgenic animals.

Authors:  A Subramanian; R K Paleyanda; H Lubon; B L Williams; F C Gwazdauskas; J W Knight; W N Drohan; W H Velander
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1996-05-15       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells.

Authors:  I Wilmut; A E Schnieke; J McWhir; A J Kind; K H Campbell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-02-27       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  The humanization of N-glycosylation pathways in yeast.

Authors:  Stefan Wildt; Tilllman U Gerngross
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 60.633

8.  Human factor IX transgenic sheep produced by transfer of nuclei from transfected fetal fibroblasts.

Authors:  A E Schnieke; A J Kind; W A Ritchie; K Mycock; A R Scott; M Ritchie; I Wilmut; A Colman; K H Campbell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-12-19       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Production of transgenic rabbits, sheep and pigs by microinjection.

Authors:  R E Hammer; V G Pursel; C E Rexroad; R J Wall; D J Bolt; K M Ebert; R D Palmiter; R L Brinster
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Jun 20-26       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Keisuke Okita; Tomoko Ichisaka; Shinya Yamanaka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  5 in total

1.  Germline modification of domestic animals.

Authors:  L Tang; R González; I Dobrinski
Journal:  Anim Reprod       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.807

2.  Will GM animals follow the GM plant fate?

Authors:  Núria Vàzquez-Salat; Louis-Marie Houdebine
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 2.788

3.  Production of recombinant human erythropoietin/Fc fusion protein by genetically manipulated chickens.

Authors:  Carlos Alberto Penno; Yoshinori Kawabe; Akira Ito; Masamichi Kamihira
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  A site-specific recombinase-based method to produce antibiotic selectable marker free transgenic cattle.

Authors:  Yuan Yu; Yongsheng Wang; Qi Tong; Xu Liu; Feng Su; Fusheng Quan; Zekun Guo; Yong Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Gene targeting, genome editing: from Dolly to editors.

Authors:  Wenfang Tan; Chris Proudfoot; Simon G Lillico; C Bruce A Whitelaw
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.788

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.