Literature DB >> 18662950

Futility, conscientious refusal, and who gets to decide.

John K Davis1.   

Abstract

Most discussions of medical futility try to answer the Futility Question: when is a medical procedure futile? No answer enjoys universal support. Some futility policies say that the health care provider will answer this question when the provider and patient (or surrogate decisionmaker) cannot agree. This raises the Decision Question: who has the moral authority to decide what to do in cases where futility is disputed? I look for a procedural answer to this question, an answer that does not turn on whether a given party happens to answer the Futility Question correctly. I argue that these policies get it right; the provider should decide because providers have a right of conscientious refusal that extends to refusing procedures on grounds of futility. This is a procedural answer because providers have this right even if they are sincerely mistaken about whether a procedure is futile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18662950     DOI: 10.1093/jmp/jhn019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Philos        ISSN: 0360-5310


  4 in total

1.  Nonbeneficial treatment and conflict resolution: building consensus.

Authors:  Craig M Nelson; Blanca Arriola Nazareth
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2013

2.  Licensing Surrogate Decision-Makers.

Authors:  Philip M Rosoff
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2017-06

3.  The familiar foundation and the fuller sense: ethics consultation and narrative.

Authors:  Craig Nelson
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2012

Review 4.  NURSES' PERCEPTIONS OF FUTILE MEDICAL CARE.

Authors:  Somayeh Rostami; Hedayat Jafari
Journal:  Mater Sociomed       Date:  2016-03-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.