Literature DB >> 18662577

Methods for distinguishing apoptotic from necrotic cells and measuring their clearance.

Dmitri V Krysko1, Tom Vanden Berghe, Eef Parthoens, Katharina D'Herde, Peter Vandenabeele.   

Abstract

Three major morphological types of cell death can be distinguished: type I (apoptotic cell death), type II (autophagic cell death), and type III (necrotic cell death). Details of the pathways of apoptotic and autophagic cell death have been described, and distinct biochemical markers have been identified. However, no distinct surface or biochemical markers of necrotic cell death have been identified yet, and only negative markers are available. These include absence of apoptotic parameters (caspase activation, cytochrome c release, and oligonucleosomal DNA fragmentation) and differential kinetics of cell death markers (phosphatidylserine exposure and cell membrane permeabilization). Moreover, a confounding factor is that apoptotic cells in the absence of phagocytosis proceed to secondary necrosis, which has many morphological features of primary necrotic cells. Secondary necrotic cells have already gone through an apoptotic stage, and so it is generally advisable in cell death research to perform time kinetics of cell death parameters. This chapter concentrates on methods that can distinguish apoptosis from necrosis on three different levels (morphological, biochemical, and analysis of cell-cell interactions) and emphasizes that only a combination of several techniques can correctly characterize cell death type. First, we describe analysis of apoptotic versus necrotic morphology by time-lapse microscopy, flow fluorocytometry, and transmission electron microscopy. We also discuss various biochemical techniques for analysis of cell surface markers (phosphatidylserine exposure versus cell permeability by flow fluorocytometry), cellular markers such as DNA fragmentation (flow fluorocytometry), caspase activation, Bid cleavage, and cytochrome c release (Western blotting). Next, we describe how primary and secondary necrotic cells can be distinguished by analysis of supernatant for caspases, HMGB1, and release of cytokeratin 18. Finally, we discuss cell-cell interactions during cell death and describe a quantitative method for examining dead cell clearance by flow fluorocytometry. A selection of techniques that can be used to study internalization mechanisms used by phagocytes to engulf dying cells is also presented, such as scanning and transmission electron microscopy and fluorescence microscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18662577     DOI: 10.1016/S0076-6879(08)01416-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Enzymol        ISSN: 0076-6879            Impact factor:   1.600


  38 in total

1.  Megasporogenesis and programmed cell death in Tillandsia (Bromeliaceae).

Authors:  Alessio Papini; Stefano Mosti; Eva Milocani; Gabriele Tani; Pietro Di Falco; Luigi Brighigna
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.356

2.  SIRT3 protects from hypoxia and staurosporine-mediated cell death by maintaining mitochondrial membrane potential and intracellular pH.

Authors:  L Pellegrini; B Pucci; L Villanova; M L Marino; G Marfe; L Sansone; E Vernucci; D Bellizzi; V Reali; M Fini; M A Russo; M Tafani
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 15.828

3.  Resolvin D1 promotes the targeting and clearance of necroptotic cells.

Authors:  Brennan D Gerlach; Michael Marinello; Justin Heinz; Nicholas Rymut; Brian E Sansbury; Colin O Riley; Sudeshna Sadhu; Zeinab Hosseini; Yoko Kojima; Dale D Tang; Nicholas J Leeper; Matthew Spite; Margarida Barroso; Katey J Rayner; Gabrielle Fredman
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 4.  Apoptosis and beyond: cytometry in studies of programmed cell death.

Authors:  Donald Wlodkowic; William Telford; Joanna Skommer; Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.441

5.  Toxicological effects of the sunscreen UV filter, benzophenone-2, on planulae and in vitro cells of the coral, Stylophora pistillata.

Authors:  C A Downs; Esti Kramarsky-Winter; John E Fauth; Roee Segal; Omri Bronstein; Rina Jeger; Yona Lichtenfeld; Cheryl M Woodley; Paul Pennington; Ariel Kushmaro; Yossi Loya
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Recommendations from the INHAND Apoptosis/Necrosis Working Group.

Authors:  Susan A Elmore; Darlene Dixon; James R Hailey; Takanori Harada; Ronald A Herbert; Robert R Maronpot; Thomas Nolte; Jerold E Rehg; Susanne Rittinghausen; Thomas J Rosol; Hiroshi Satoh; Justin D Vidal; Cynthia L Willard-Mack; Dianne M Creasy
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 1.902

7.  Ikaros expression sensitizes leukemic cells to the chemotherapeutic drug doxorubicin.

Authors:  Licai He; Shenmeng Gao; Zhenfeng Zhu; Shang Chen; Haihua Gu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  Oral commensal bacteria differentially modulate epithelial cell death.

Authors:  Tyresia White; Yelena Alimova; Vanessa Tubero Euzebio Alves; Pinar Emecen-Huja; Mohanad Al-Sabbagh; Alejandro Villasante; Jeffrey L Ebersole; Octavio A Gonzalez
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 2.633

9.  Inhibition of Eyes Absent Homolog 4 expression induces malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor necrosis.

Authors:  S J Miller; Z D Lan; A Hardiman; J Wu; J J Kordich; D M Patmore; R S Hegde; T P Cripe; J A Cancelas; M H Collins; N Ratner
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  Proteasome inhibitors activate autophagy as a cytoprotective response in human prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  K Zhu; K Dunner; D J McConkey
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 9.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.