Literature DB >> 18662174

A nomogram predicting metastatic progression after radical prostatectomy.

Christopher R Porter1, Nazareno Suardi, Koichi Kodama, Umberto Capitanio, Robert P Gibbons, Roy Correa, Claudio Jeldres, Paul Perrotte, Francesco Montorsi, Pierre I Karakiewicz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop and internally validate a nomogram predicting the individual probability of metastatic progression after radical prostatectomy according to the length of disease-free interval.
METHODS: Cox regression modeled the probability of metastatic progression of prostate cancer in 752 patients treated with radical prostatectomy with a mean follow up of 11.6 years (median 11.4; range 0.1-40.5). The significance of the predictors was confirmed in competing risks analysis, which accounts for other causes of mortality. The Cox regression model-based nomogram was internally validated with 200 bootstrap resamples.
RESULTS: Eighty-five of 752 patients (11.3%) developed metastatic progression. The 5, 10, 15 and 20-year actuarial rates of metastatic progression-free survival were, respectively, 95.9, 90.5, 84.8 and 80.5%. Pathological stage T3, elevated radical prostatectomy Gleason sum and delivery of adjuvant radiotherapy represented independent predictors of metastatic progression in both Cox and competing risks regression models, and constituted the nomogram predictors along with a fourth variable describing the presence of co-morbidities. After 200 bootstrap resamples the nomogram achieved 80.2, 77.7, 77.6 and 76.0% accuracy in predicting metastatic progression at 5, 10, 15 and 20 years after radical prostatectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Metastatic progression is a sign of poor prognosis in men with prostate cancer. Our nomogram is able to accurately predict the conditional probability of metastatic progression up to 20 years after radical prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18662174     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02105.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  5 in total

Review 1.  Predictive and prognostic models in radical prostatectomy candidates: a critical analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Giovanni Lughezzani; Alberto Briganti; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Michael W Kattan; Francesco Montorsi; Shahrokh F Shariat; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Soluble interleukin-6 receptor to interleukin-6 (sIL‑6R/IL-6) ratio in serum as a predictor of high Gleason sum at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Daniela Terracciano; Dario Bruzzese; Matteo Ferro; Riccardo Autorino; Giuseppe di Lorenzo; Carlo Buonerba; Angela Mariano; Vincenzo Macchia; Vincenzo Altieri; Angelina di Carlo
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Development of ProCaRS Clinical Nomograms for Biochemical Failure-free Survival Following Either Low-Dose Rate Brachytherapy or Conventionally Fractionated External Beam Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Andrew Warner; Tom Pickles; Juanita Crook; Andre-Guy Martin; Luis Souhami; Charles Catton; Himu Lukka; George Rodrigues
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2015-06-11

4.  Are preoperative Kattan and Stephenson nomograms predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy applicable in the Chinese population?

Authors:  Victor H W Yeung; Yi Chiu; Sylvia S Y Yu; W H Au; Steve W H Chan
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-03-05

5.  Very-high-risk localized prostate cancer: definition and outcomes.

Authors:  D Sundi; V M Wang; P M Pierorazio; M Han; T J Bivalacqua; M W Ball; E S Antonarakis; A W Partin; E M Schaeffer; A E Ross
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 5.554

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.