Literature DB >> 18662138

Sex differences in dispersal and the evolution of helping and harming.

Rufus A Johnstone1, Michael A Cant.   

Abstract

In this article, we explore the impact of sex-biased dispersal on local relatedness and on selection for helping and harming behavior among males and females. We show that in a patch-structured population, when there is a marked sex bias in dispersal, selection will almost always favor harming behavior among individuals of the sex more prone to dispersal. This result holds regardless of the effects of mating skew or overlapping generations. Selection may well also favor helping behavior among individuals of the philopatric sex, particularly if there is generational overlap, but this is less likely to occur if individuals of the philopatric sex compete more intensely for fewer breeding opportunities. In this last case, if generational overlap is low and mating skew pronounced, the result may be selection for harming behavior among both males and females. In general, the rate of dispersal and the level of relatedness among individuals of one sex do not reliably predict their level of helping or harming behavior; selection on either males or females depends on the dispersal of both sexes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18662138     DOI: 10.1086/589899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  31 in total

Review 1.  How life history and demography promote or inhibit the evolution of helping behaviours.

Authors:  Laurent Lehmann; François Rousset
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Relatedness predicts multiple measures of investment in cooperative nest construction in sociable weavers.

Authors:  Gavin M Leighton; Sebastian Echeverri; Dirk Heinrich; Holger Kolberg
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  Models of social evolution: can we do better to predict 'who helps whom to achieve what'?

Authors:  António M M Rodrigues; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Viscous medium promotes cooperation in the pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Rolf Kümmerli; Ashleigh S Griffin; Stuart A West; Angus Buckling; Freya Harrison
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Sex-biased dispersal, haplodiploidy and the evolution of helping in social insects.

Authors:  Rufus A Johnstone; Michael A Cant; Jeremy Field
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Reproductive control via eviction (but not the threat of eviction) in banded mongooses.

Authors:  Michael A Cant; Sarah J Hodge; Matthew B V Bell; Jason S Gilchrist; Hazel J Nichols
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  The evolution of menopause in cetaceans and humans: the role of demography.

Authors:  Rufus A Johnstone; Michael A Cant
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  On the evolution of harming and recognition in finite panmictic and infinite structured populations.

Authors:  Laurent Lehmann; Marcus W Feldman; François Rousset
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Demography and the tragedy of the commons.

Authors:  S A Frank
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Intra-sexual selection in cooperative mammals and birds: why are females not bigger and better armed?

Authors:  Andrew J Young; Nigel C Bennett
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.