Literature DB >> 18661433

IGRT in rectal cancer.

Edy Ippolito1, Ine Mertens, Karin Haustermans, Maria Antonietta Gambacorta, Danilo Pasini, Vincenzo Valentini.   

Abstract

To date, no great interest has been shown in the clinical implementation of recent Image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) modalities in rectal cancer since only a few studies have been published on this issue. This may be explained by the fact that with current treatment modalities locoregional recurrences are already very low (around 10%). However, there is still room for improvement in treatment of high risk patients (cT3 CRM+, cT4, N+). In these patients better results may be obtained improving radiation technique from 2D to 3D, which showed to be more reliable in terms of target coverage. Also, when higher doses are delivered, Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) may be used to spare small bowel. But before employing 3D irradiation or IMRT, a proper definition of our clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume (PTV) is needed. The CTV should encompass the tumour site, the mesorectum and the lateral nodes, recognized as the most likely sites of local recurrence, with different incidence according to tumour stage. Recent studies discussed the correct delineation of these target volumes in respect of tumour site and stage. From the preliminary results of a study conducted in Rome University 2D planning seemed insufficient to cover the different target volumes especially in T4 patients compared to 3D planning. Also an appropriate PTV margin is necessary in order to manage set-up errors and organ motion. Particularly in these patients, the knowledge of mesorectal movement is required to avoid target missing. Large mesorectal displacements were observed in a study carried out in Leuven University in collaboration with Rome University. A systematic review of the literature together with the data from these first experiences led to the awareness that IGRT could help us to follow the target volume and organs at risk during the treatment, allowing adjustments to improve accuracy in dose delivery, especially when dose escalation studies are planned in the treatment of rectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18661433     DOI: 10.1080/02841860802256459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  14 in total

1.  Cone-beam computed tomography for organ motion evaluation in locally advanced rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Consuelo Rosa; Luciana Caravatta; Monica Di Tommaso; David Fasciolo; Lucrezia Gasparini; Fiorella Cristina Di Guglielmo; Antonietta Augurio; Annamaria Vinciguerra; Claudio Vecchi; Domenico Genovesi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Prospective randomized double-blind pilot study of site-specific consensus atlas implementation for rectal cancer target volume delineation in the cooperative group setting.

Authors:  Clifton D Fuller; Jasper Nijkamp; Joop C Duppen; Coen R N Rasch; Charles R Thomas; Samuel J Wang; Paul Okunieff; William E Jones; Daniel Baseman; Shilpen Patel; Carlo G N Demandante; Anna M Harris; Benjamin D Smith; Alan W Katz; Camille McGann; Jennifer L Harper; Daniel T Chang; Stephen Smalley; David T Marshall; Karyn A Goodman; Niko Papanikolaou; Lisa A Kachnic
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Schedule for CT image guidance in treating prostate cancer with helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  G Beldjoudi; S Yartsev; G Bauman; J Battista; J Van Dyk
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Neo-adjuvant radiotherapy in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Bengt Glimelius
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Multidisciplinary treatment of patients with rectal cancer: Development during the past decades and plans for the future.

Authors:  Bengt Glimelius
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.384

6.  Comparison of measurement methods with a mixed effects procedure accounting for replicated evaluations (COM3PARE): method comparison algorithm implementation for head and neck IGRT positional verification.

Authors:  Anuradha Roy; Clifton D Fuller; David I Rosenthal; Charles R Thomas
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 1.930

7.  Dosimetric comparative study of 3 different postoperative radiotherapy techniques (3D-CRT, IMRT, and RapidArc) for II-III stage rectal cancer.

Authors:  Min Liu; Bailong Liu; Huidong Wang; Lijuan Ding; Yinghua Shi; Chao Ge; Xu Su; Xiaodong Liu; Lihua Dong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Automatic segmentation software in locally advanced rectal cancer: READY (REsearch program in Auto Delineation sYstem)-RECTAL 02: prospective study.

Authors:  Maria A Gambacorta; Luca Boldrini; Chiara Valentini; Nicola Dinapoli; Gian C Mattiucci; Giuditta Chiloiro; Danilo Pasini; Stefania Manfrida; Nicola Caria; Bruce D Minsky; Vincenzo Valentini
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-07-05

9.  Feasibility of image-guided radiotherapy for elderly patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Nam P Nguyen; Misty Ceizyk; Jacqueline Vock; Paul Vos; Alexander Chi; Vincent Vinh-Hung; Judy Pugh; Rihan Khan; Christina Truong; Gabby Albala; Angela Locke; Ulf Karlsson; Steve Gelumbauskas; Lexie Smith-Raymond
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Does setup on rectal wall improve rectal cancer boost radiotherapy?

Authors:  Jean-Paul J E Kleijnen; Bram van Asselen; Martijn Intven; Johannes P M Burbach; Marielle E P Philippens; Jan J W Lagendijk; Bas W Raaymakers
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.