Literature DB >> 18661430

Present status and future of high-precision image guided adaptive brachytherapy for cervix carcinoma.

Richard Potter1, Christian Kirisits, Elena F Fidarova, Johannes C A Dimopoulos, Daniel Berger, Kari Tanderup, Jacob C Lindegaard.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Image guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) for cervical cancer, using mainly MRI, is an evolving method, increasingly replacing the 2D approach based on conventional radiography. During the complex 4D chain of this procedure image-assistance is provided for disease assessment, provisional treatment planning ("pre-planning"), applicator placement and reconstruction, as well as for contouring, definitive treatment planning and quality control of dose delivery. With IGABT changes of topography adjacent to the applicator, caused by tumour regression, oedema, organ changes and dilation are identified. Thus, the CTV for IGABT is primarily based on the tumour volume at the time of BT and takes into account both time and spatial domains. IGABT requires systematic concepts for target, OAR, biological modelling, DVH analysis, and dose-volume-adaptation. METHODS AND
RESULTS: This report focuses on the advantages and uncertainties, dose-effect relations and clinical results of the IGABT procedure addressing the current status and future perspectives. Uncertainties during the 4D chain of IGABT are mainly related to target contouring, applicator reconstruction, as well as to inter-fraction, intra-fraction and inter-application variability, as caused by tumour response and organ changes. Different from EBRT where set-up uncertainties are compensated by adding a margin to the CTV, no margins to the lateral and anterior-posterior directions can be used for IGABT. DISCUSSION: By 3D treatment planning for IGABT significant improvement of the DVH parameters is achieved compared to 2D library plans. In small tumours the benefit is primarily obtained by a decrease of dose to nearby OAR while in large tumours the use of supplementary interstitial techniques and optimization may double the target volume that can be treated at a therapeutic dose level. The clinical impact of IGABT could recently be demonstrated by the establishment of some correlations between target- and organ-related DVH parameters versus disease control and side effects, which need further clarification. Overall, a very high local control rate can be achieved with minor treatment related morbidity. This favourable therapeutic ratio seems to be now reproducible under different conditions at various treatment centres. These results have to be validated within the upcoming multi-centre prospective IntErnational study on MRI-guided brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer (EMBRACE).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18661430     DOI: 10.1080/02841860802282794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  26 in total

Review 1.  Consensus on 3D treatment planning in gynaecologic brachytherapy of the Radiation Oncology Spanish Society (SEOR) Brachytherapy Group.

Authors:  José Luis Guinot; José Pérez-Calatayud; Silvia Rodríguez; Alejandro Tormo; Vincente Crispán; Juan Carlos Menéndez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 2.  Current status and perspectives of brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Takafumi Toita
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Open MR-guided high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy: feasibility and initial experiences open MR-guided high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Ferenc Lakosi; Gergely Antal; Csaba Vandulek; Arpad Kovacs; Gabor L Toller; Istvan Rakasz; Gabor Bajzik; Janaki Hadjiev; Peter Bogner; Imre Repa
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.201

4.  Practical Clinical Workflows for Online and Offline Adaptive Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Olga L Green; Lauren E Henke; Geoffrey D Hugo
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 5.934

Review 5.  American Brachytherapy Task Group Report: A pooled analysis of clinical outcomes for high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jyoti Mayadev; Akila Viswanathan; Yu Liu; Chin-Shang Li; Kevin Albuquerque; Antonio L Damato; Sushil Beriwal; Beth Erickson
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2017 Jan - Feb       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Feasibility of transrectal ultrasonography for assessment of cervical cancer.

Authors:  M P Schmid; R Pötter; P Brader; A Kratochwil; G Goldner; K Kirchheiner; A Sturdza; C Kirisits
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Imaging across the life span: innovations in imaging and therapy for gynecologic cancer.

Authors:  Meng Xu-Welliver; William T C Yuh; Julia R Fielding; Katarzyna J Macura; Zhibin Huang; Ahmet S Ayan; Floor J Backes; Guang Jia; Mariam Moshiri; Jun Zhang; Nina A Mayr
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

8.  Verification of Guiding Needle Placement by Registered Ultrasound Image During Combined Intracavitary/Interstitial Gynecologic Brachytherapy.

Authors:  Jing Zeng; Ziqi Liu; Shan Jiang; Qingsong Pang; Ping Wang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.989

9.  Why are we still in the 1950s regarding management of cancer of uterine cervix ?

Authors:  K R Das
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2012-10

Review 10.  Dose Summation Strategies for External Beam Radiation Therapy and Brachytherapy in Gynecologic Malignancy: A Review from the NRG Oncology and NCTN Medical Physics Subcommittees.

Authors:  Hayeon Kim; Yongsook C Lee; Stanley H Benedict; Brandon Dyer; Michael Price; Yi Rong; Ananth Ravi; Eric Leung; Sushil Beriwal; Mark E Bernard; Jyoti Mayadev; Jessica R L Leif; Ying Xiao
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.