Literature DB >> 18661208

The change in retentive force of magnetic attachment by abrasion.

Yuanjin Huang1, Yasuyuki Tawada, Yoshiaki Hata, Fumihiko Watanabe.   

Abstract

Magnets are frequently applied to removable dentures as retentive attachments. A magnet-retained removable overdenture might be slightly shifted from side to side by eccentric movement in the mouth, and the surface of magnetic attachment may be worn as a result. However, the relationship between the retentive force of magnetic attachment and its surface abrasion has not been reported. The purpose of this research is to investigate this relationship. Ten Mgfit DX 400 magnetic attachments for natural tooth roots were used for this experiment. The magnetic attachments were embedded in autopolymerizing acrylic resin, and ten pairs of specimens were fabricated. A 5-mm repeated gliding motion was applied on each pair of specimens until 30 000, 50 000, or 90 000 cycles had been achieved. The abrasion machine was under 5 kg loading, and the slide speed was 60 times/min. The retentive force of magnetic attachment was measured with a tension gauge at (1) before gliding; (2) after 30 000 gliding cycles; (3)after 50 000 gliding cycles; or (4) after 90 000 gliding cycles. The average change of retentive force of ten magnetic attachments after 30 000, 50 000, and 90 000 gliding cycles was 0.016 N, 0.003 N, and -0.008 N, respectively. The change was statistically analyzed using a paired-sample t test, which showed that the number of gliding cycles did not affect the retentive force of magnetic attachment significantly. The surface of magnetic attachment after gliding was observed by a microscope, and the abrasion of this attachment surface is clearly seen.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18661208     DOI: 10.1007/s10266-008-0085-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Odontology        ISSN: 1618-1247            Impact factor:   2.634


  8 in total

1.  [The measurement of retentive force of laser-melted and cast post-keepers of Magfit magnetic attachments].

Authors:  Ling Yang; Li Du; Yinghe Lin
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2003-10

2.  In vitro effect of microwave irradiation on the retentive force of magnets.

Authors:  James C Lemon; Rene A Brignoni; Stephen M Collard; Jack W Martin; John M Powers; Mark S Chambers
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  The biological effects of implanted magnetic fields on the bone tissue of dogs.

Authors:  O T Altay; T Kutkam; O Koseoglu; S Tanyeri
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Use of new magnetic attachments for implant-supported overdentures.

Authors:  T Fujimoto; A Niimi; I Murakami; M Ueda
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Rare earth magnetic attachments: the state of the art in removable prosthodontics.

Authors:  T R Jackson; K W Healey
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 1.677

6.  Retention and wear of precision-type attachments.

Authors:  B L Stewart; R O Edwards
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 3.426

7.  Magnetic retention for complete and partial overdentures. Part I.

Authors:  B R Gillings
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  Static magnetic field effects on the sagittal suture in Rattus norvegicus.

Authors:  S Camilleri; F McDonald
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.650

  8 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Factors Affecting the Attractive Force of Dental Magnetic Attachment: A Literature Review for Guiding Dentists in Clinical Application.

Authors:  An-Nissa Kusumadewi; Lisda Damayanti
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-06-14
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.