PURPOSE: The use of canine models of retinal disease in the development of therapeutic strategies for inherited retinal disorders is a growing area of research. To evaluate accurately the success of potential vision-enhancing treatments, reliable methods for objectively assessing visual function in canine models is necessary. METHODS: A simple vision-testing device was constructed that consisted of a junction box with four exit tunnels. Dogs were placed in the junction box and given one vision-based choice for exit. The first-choice tunnel and time to exit were recorded and analyzed. Two canine models of retinal disease with distinct molecular defects, a null mutation in the gene encoding the alpha subunit of rod cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase (PDE6A), and a null mutation in the gene encoding a retinal pigment epithelium-specific protein (RPE65) were tested and compared to those in unaffected dogs. RESULTS: With the use of bright light versus dim red light, the test differentiated between unaffected dogs and dogs affected with either mutation with a high degree of certainty. The white-light intensity series showed a significantly different performance between the unaffected and affected dogs. A significant difference in performance was detected between the dogs with each mutation. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that this novel canine vision-testing method is an accurate and sensitive means of distinguishing between unaffected dogs and dogs affected with two different forms of inherited retinal disease and should be useful as a means of assessing response to therapy in future studies.
PURPOSE: The use of canine models of retinal disease in the development of therapeutic strategies for inherited retinal disorders is a growing area of research. To evaluate accurately the success of potential vision-enhancing treatments, reliable methods for objectively assessing visual function in canine models is necessary. METHODS: A simple vision-testing device was constructed that consisted of a junction box with four exit tunnels. Dogs were placed in the junction box and given one vision-based choice for exit. The first-choice tunnel and time to exit were recorded and analyzed. Two canine models of retinal disease with distinct molecular defects, a null mutation in the gene encoding the alpha subunit of rod cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase (PDE6A), and a null mutation in the gene encoding a retinal pigment epithelium-specific protein (RPE65) were tested and compared to those in unaffected dogs. RESULTS: With the use of bright light versus dim red light, the test differentiated between unaffected dogs and dogs affected with either mutation with a high degree of certainty. The white-light intensity series showed a significantly different performance between the unaffected and affected dogs. A significant difference in performance was detected between the dogs with each mutation. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that this novel canine vision-testing method is an accurate and sensitive means of distinguishing between unaffected dogs and dogs affected with two different forms of inherited retinal disease and should be useful as a means of assessing response to therapy in future studies.
Authors: Annie Oh; Ellis R Loew; Melanie L Foster; Michael G Davidson; Robert V English; Kristen J Gervais; Ian P Herring; Freya M Mowat Journal: Doc Ophthalmol Date: 2018-07-26 Impact factor: 2.379
Authors: Monique M Garcia; Gui-shuang Ying; Christina A Cocores; Jacqueline C Tanaka; András M Komáromy Journal: Am J Vet Res Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 1.156
Authors: M J Annear; J T Bartoe; S E Barker; A J Smith; P G Curran; J W Bainbridge; R R Ali; S M Petersen-Jones Journal: Gene Ther Date: 2010-08-12 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Simon M Petersen-Jones; Laurence M Occelli; Paige A Winkler; Winston Lee; Janet R Sparrow; Mai Tsukikawa; Sanford L Boye; Vince Chiodo; Jenina E Capasso; Elvir Becirovic; Christian Schön; Mathias W Seeliger; Alex V Levin; Stylianos Michalakis; William W Hauswirth; Stephen H Tsang Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2017-11-20 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Freya M Mowat; Simon M Petersen-Jones; Helen Williamson; David L Williams; Philip J Luthert; Robin R Ali; James W Bainbridge Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2008-12-29 Impact factor: 2.367
Authors: Freya M Mowat; Laurence M Occelli; Joshua T Bartoe; Kristen J Gervais; Ashlee R Bruewer; Janice Querubin; Astra Dinculescu; Sanford L Boye; William W Hauswirth; Simon M Petersen-Jones Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2017-06-20 Impact factor: 5.152