Literature DB >> 18658101

Reductions in mortality associated with intensive public reporting of hospital outcomes.

Christopher S Hollenbeak1, Christopher P Gorton, Ying P Tabak, Jayne L Jones, Arnold Milstein, Richard S Johannes.   

Abstract

It is unclear whether public reporting of hospital and physician performance has improved outcomes for the conditions being reported. We studied the effect of intensive public reporting on hospital mortality for 6 high-frequency, high-mortality medical conditions. Patients in Pennsylvania were matched to patients in other states with varying public reporting environments using propensity score methods. The effect of public reporting was estimated using a difference in differences approach. Patients treated at hospitals subjected to intensive public reporting had significantly lower odds of in-hospital mortality when compared with similar patients treated at hospitals in environments with no public reporting or only limited reporting. Overall, the 2000-2003 in-hospital mortality odds ratio for Pennsylvania patients versus non-Pennsylvania patients ranged from 0.59 to 0.79 across 6 clinical conditions (all P < .0001). For the same comparison using the 1997-1999 period, odds ratios ranged from 0.72 to 0.90, suggesting improvement when intensive public reporting occurred.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18658101     DOI: 10.1177/1062860608318451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Qual        ISSN: 1062-8606            Impact factor:   1.852


  7 in total

Review 1.  Public release of performance data in changing the behaviour of healthcare consumers, professionals or organisations.

Authors:  Nicole A B M Ketelaar; Marjan J Faber; Signe Flottorp; Liv Helen Rygh; Katherine H O Deane; Martin P Eccles
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-11-09

2.  Development and validation of a disease-specific risk adjustment system using automated clinical data.

Authors:  Ying P Tabak; Xiaowu Sun; Karen G Derby; Stephen G Kurtz; Richard S Johannes
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Matching and Regression to the Mean in Difference-in-Differences Analysis.

Authors:  Jamie R Daw; Laura A Hatfield
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Review of stroke center effectiveness and other get with the guidelines data.

Authors:  Gisele Sampaio Silva; Lee H Schwamm
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.113

5.  Using electronic health record data to develop inpatient mortality predictive model: Acute Laboratory Risk of Mortality Score (ALaRMS).

Authors:  Ying P Tabak; Xiaowu Sun; Carlos M Nunez; Richard S Johannes
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Effectiveness of an organized colorectal cancer screening program on increasing adherence in asymptomatic average-risk Canadians.

Authors:  Thomas J Charters; Erin C Strumpf; Maida J Sewitch
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 7.  The impact of Public Reporting on clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Paolo Campanella; Vladimir Vukovic; Paolo Parente; Adela Sulejmani; Walter Ricciardi; Maria Lucia Specchia
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.