Literature DB >> 18658032

Comparison of primary angioplasty with stent placement for treating symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic diseases: a multicenter study.

Farhan Siddiq1, Gabriela Vazquez, Muhammad Zeeshan Memon, M Fareed K Suri, Robert A Taylor, Joan C Wojak, John C Chaloupka, Adnan I Qureshi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: We sought to compare the clinical outcomes between primary angioplasty and stent placement for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and angiographic data of 190 patients treated with 95 primary angioplasty procedures and 98 intracranial stent placements (total of 193 procedures) in 3 tertiary care centers. Stroke and combined stroke and/or death were identified as primary clinical end points during the periprocedural and follow-up period of 5 years. The rates of significant postoperative residual stenosis (>/=50% of greater stenosis immediately after the procedure) and binary restenosis (>/=50% stenosis at follow-up angiography within 3 years) were also compared. The comparative analysis was performed after adjusting for age, sex, and center.
RESULTS: Fourteen procedures in the angioplasty-treated group (15%) and 4 in the stent-treated group (4.1%) had significant postoperative residual stenosis (relative risk [RR]=2.8, 95% CI, 0.85 to 9.5, P=0.09, for the adjusted model). There were 3 periprocedural deaths (1.5%), 1 in the angioplasty group (1.1%) and 2 in the stent-treated group (2.0%) and 14 periprocedural strokes (7.3%), 7 periprocedural strokes in each group (7.4% and 7.1%, respectively; hazard ratio=1.1; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.9, P=0.85). Angiographic follow-up was available for 134 procedures (66 angioplasty-treated and 68 stent-treated cases). Forty-eight procedures (36.1%) had evidence of binary restenosis (25 of 66 angioplasties, 23 of 68 stents, P=0.85). Binary restenosis-free survival at 12 months was 68% for the angioplasty-treated group and 64% for the stent-treated group. There was no difference in follow-up survival (stroke, or stroke and/or death) between the angioplasty-treated and the stent-treated groups (hazard ratio=0.54; 95% CI, 0.11 to 2.5, P=0.44 and hazard ratio=0.50; 95%, CI 0.17 to 1.5, P=0.22, respectively, after adjusting for age, sex, and center). The stroke- and/or death-free survival at 2 years for the angioplasty-treated group and the stent-treated group was 92+/-4% and 89+/-5%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Stent treatment for intracranial atherosclerosis may lower the rate of significant postoperative residual stenosis compared with primary angioplasty alone. No benefit of stent placement over primary angioplasty in reducing stroke or stroke and/or death could be identified in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18658032     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.515361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  22 in total

Review 1.  Symptomatic intracranial arterial disease: incidence, natural history, diagnosis, and management.

Authors:  Ananth K Vellimana; Andria L Ford; Jin-Moo Lee; Colin P Derdeyn; Gregory J Zipfel
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.047

2.  The new standard for performance of intracranial angioplasty and stent placement after Stenting versus Aggressive Medical Therapy for Intracranial Arterial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) Trial.

Authors:  S A Chaudhry; M Watanabe; A I Qureshi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Balloon Angioplasty for Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Lakshmi Sudha Prasanna Karanam; Mukesh Sharma; Anand Alurkar; Sridhar Reddy Baddam; Vijaya Pamidimukkala; Raghavasarma Polavarapu
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2017-06

4.  Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in a patient with internal carotid artery stenosis following gamma knife radiosurgery for recurrent pituitary adenoma.

Authors:  Hidemichi Ito; Hidetaka Onodera; Taigen Sase; Masashi Uchida; Hiroyuki Morishima; Kotaro Oshio; Takashi Shuto; Yuichiro Tanaka
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2015-05-28

5.  Balloon-expandable stent placement in patients with immediate reocclusion after initial successful thrombolysis of acute middle cerebral arterial obstruction.

Authors:  H K Lee; H S Kwak; G H Chung; S B Hwang
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 1.610

Review 6.  Off-label use of drugs and devices in the neuroendovascular suite.

Authors:  M M Abdihalim; A E Hassan; A I Qureshi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  MR angiography and imaging for the evaluation of middle cerebral artery atherosclerotic disease.

Authors:  A J Degnan; G Gallagher; Z Teng; J Lu; Q Liu; J H Gillard
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 8.  Internal carotid artery stenting for intracranial atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Joshua W Osbun; Louis J Kim
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec

9.  A randomized trial comparing primary angioplasty versus stent placement for symptomatic intracranial stenosis.

Authors:  Adnan I Qureshi; Saqib A Chaudhry; Farhan Siddiq; Shahram Majidi; Gustavo J Rodriguez; M Fareed K Suri
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2013-12

Review 10.  Treatment of atherosclerotic intracranial arterial stenosis.

Authors:  Tanya N Turan; Colin P Derdeyn; David Fiorella; Marc I Chimowitz
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 7.914

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.