Literature DB >> 18657667

A randomized trial of the aldosterone-receptor antagonist eplerenone in asymptomatic moderate-severe aortic stenosis.

Ralph A H Stewart1, Andrew J Kerr, Brett R Cowan, Alistair A Young, Christopher Occleshaw, A Mark Richards, Colin Edwards, Gillian A Whalley, Denis Freidlander, Miles Williams, Robert N Doughty, Irene Zeng, Harvey D White.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study is to determine whether the selective aldosterone-receptor antagonist eplerenone delays onset of left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction or reduces LV hypertrophy in asymptomatic patients with moderate to severe aortic stenosis. Effects of eplerenone on LV diastolic function and progression of valve stenosis were also evaluated.
METHODS: Sixty-five asymptomatic patients with a peak aortic valve velocity >3.0 m/s and normal LV function were randomized double blind to eplerenone, 100 mg daily (n = 33), or placebo (n = 32) for a median of 19 (interquartile range 15 to 25) months. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography were performed and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide was measured at baseline and follow-up.
RESULTS: Symptomatic deterioration occurred in 13 subjects randomized to eplerenone and 11 to placebo (P = .34). Change in LV mass index (mean change +/- SD -0.3 +/- 14.6 vs +5.1 +/- 15 g/m(2) per year, P = .3), LV ejection fraction (+0.0% +/- 5.7% vs +0.8% +/- 5.7% per year, P = .9), and LV end-systolic volume index (-1.2 +/- 9 vs +0.04 +/- 12 mL/m(2) per year, P = .8) were small and similar for patients randomized to eplerenone and placebo, respectively. Decrease of aortic valve area (-0.11 +/- 0.22 vs -0.18 +/- 0.24 cm(2)/y, P = .2), worsening of LV diastolic dysfunction by echo-Doppler (E/E' +0.49 +/- 0.7 vs +1.32 +/- 2.0/year, P = .4), increase in the plasma level of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (+63% vs +12% per year, P = .1), and decline in physical function score (9 +/- 34 vs 12 +/- 37/year, P = .7) were similar for subjects randomized to eplerenone and placebo, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In asymptomatic patients with moderate-severe aortic stenosis, eplerenone did not slow onset of LV systolic or diastolic dysfunction, decrease LV mass, or reduce progression of valve stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18657667     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  10 in total

Review 1.  Eplerenone: a review of its use in patients with chronic systolic heart failure and mild symptoms.

Authors:  Sohita Dhillon
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Rapid MR assessment of left ventricular systolic function after acute myocardial infarction using single breath-hold cine imaging with the temporal parallel acquisition technique (TPAT) and 4D guide-point modelling analysis of left ventricular function.

Authors:  Holger C Eberle; Kai Nassenstein; Christoph J Jensen; Thomas Schlosser; Georg V Sabin; Christoph K Naber; Oliver Bruder
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Pathogenesis of aortic stenosis: not just a matter of wear and tear.

Authors:  Aaron L Sverdlov; Doan Tm Ngo; Matthew J Chapman; Onn Akbar Ali; Yuliy Y Chirkov; John D Horowitz
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2011-07-28

4.  Animal models of calcific aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Krista L Sider; Mark C Blaser; Craig A Simmons
Journal:  Int J Inflam       Date:  2011-08-02

5.  Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis and the Effect of Vitamin K2 on Calcification Using 18F-Sodium Fluoride Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance: The BASIK2 Rationale and Trial Design.

Authors:  Frederique E C M Peeters; Manouk J W van Mourik; Steven J R Meex; Jan Bucerius; Simon M Schalla; Suzanne C Gerretsen; Casper Mihl; Marc R Dweck; Leon J Schurgers; Joachim E Wildberger; Harry J G M Crijns; Bas L J H Kietselaer
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 6.  The Role of Imaging in Measuring Disease Progression and Assessing Novel Therapies in Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Mhairi K Doris; Russell J Everett; Matthew Shun-Shin; Marie-Annick Clavel; Marc R Dweck
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-01

7.  Medical management of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis in patients non-eligible for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Gabriela Silvia Gheorghe; Andreea Simona Hodorogea; Andrei Cristian Dan Gheorghe; Ioan Tiberiu Nanea; Ana Ciobanu
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 8.  Arterial Hypertension in Aortic Valve Stenosis: A Critical Update.

Authors:  Christian Basile; Ilaria Fucile; Maria Lembo; Maria Virginia Manzi; Federica Ilardi; Anna Franzone; Costantino Mancusi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 9.  Current Evidence and Future Perspectives on Pharmacological Treatment of Calcific Aortic Valve Stenosis.

Authors:  Maristella Donato; Nicola Ferri; Maria Giovanna Lupo; Elisabetta Faggin; Marcello Rattazzi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Antihypertensive therapies in moderate or severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan Sen; Erin Chung; Christopher Neil; Thomas Marwick
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.