Literature DB >> 18657209

Diet shift of a facultative scavenger, the wolverine, following recolonization of wolves.

Jiska van Dijk1, Line Gustavsen, Atle Mysterud, Roel May, Øystein Flagstad, Henrik Brøseth, Roy Andersen, Reidar Andersen, Harald Steen, Arild Landa.   

Abstract

1. Wolves Canis lupus L. recolonized the boreal forests in the southern part of the Scandinavian peninsula during the late 1990s, but so far there has been little attention to its effect on ecosystem functioning. Wolf predation increases the availability of carcasses of large prey, especially moose Alces alces L., which may lead in turn to a diet switch in facultative scavengers such as the wolverine Gulo gulo L. 2. Using 459 wolverine scats collected during winter-spring 2001-04 for DNA identity and dietary contents, we compared diet inside and outside wolf territories while controlling for potential confounding factors, such as prey density. We tested the hypothesis that wolverine diet shifted towards moose in the presence of wolves, while taking into account possible sexual segregation between the sexes. Occurrence of reindeer, moose and small prey was modelled against explanatory covariates using logistic mixed-effects models. Furthermore, we compared diet composition and breadth among habitats and sexes. 3. Occurrence of reindeer, moose and small prey in the diet varied with prey availability and habitat. As expected, diet contained more moose and less reindeer and small prey in the presence of wolves. Their diet in tundra consisted of 40% reindeer Rangifer tarandus L., 39% moose and 9% rodents. In forest with wolf, their diet shifted to 76% moose, 18% reindeer and 5% rodents; compared to 42% moose, 32% reindeer and 15% rodents in forest without wolf. This diet switch could not be explained by higher moose density in wolf territories. Female diet consisted of more small prey than for males, but there was a tendency for females to use the highly available moose carrion opportunistically and to hunt less on small prey within wolf territories. 4. Our study highlights how wolves increase scavenging opportunities for wolverines, and how sexual differences in diet may also apply to large scavengers. Due to their more restricted home range, female wolverines are forced to rely more on hunting small prey. The relatively high occurrence of wolf kills, however, forms an important food source to wolverines in this area. The recolonization of wolves may therefore have contributed to the consequent recolonization of wolverines into the same area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18657209     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01445.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  14 in total

1.  The relationship between wolverine and larger predators, lynx and wolf, in a historical ecosystem context.

Authors:  Hussein Khalil; Marianne Pasanen-Mortensen; Bodil Elmhagen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Dynamic interactions between apex predators reveal contrasting seasonal attraction patterns.

Authors:  S Périquet; H Fritz; E Revilla; D W Macdonald; A J Loveridge; G Mtare; M Valeix
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  When species' ranges meet: assessing differences in habitat selection between sympatric large carnivores.

Authors:  Geir Rune Rauset; Jenny Mattisson; Henrik Andrén; Guillaume Chapron; Jens Persson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Diet Shift and Its Impact on Foraging Behavior of Siberian Crane (Grus Leucogeranus) in Poyang Lake.

Authors:  Yifei Jia; Shengwu Jiao; Yamian Zhang; Yan Zhou; Guangchun Lei; Guanhua Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The role of predation and food limitation on claims for compensation, reindeer demography and population dynamics.

Authors:  Torkild Tveraa; Audun Stien; Henrik Brøseth; Nigel G Yoccoz
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 6.528

6.  Fear or food - abundance of red fox in relation to occurrence of lynx and wolf.

Authors:  Camilla Wikenros; Malin Aronsson; Olof Liberg; Anders Jarnemo; Jessica Hansson; Märtha Wallgren; Håkan Sand; Roger Bergström
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Predatory blue crabs induce stronger nonconsumptive effects in eastern oysters Crassostrea virginica than scavenging blue crabs.

Authors:  Avery E Scherer; Miranda M Garcia; Delbert L Smee
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Habitat differentiation within the large-carnivore community of Norway's multiple-use landscapes.

Authors:  Roel May; Jiska van Dijk; Petter Wabakken; Jon E Swenson; John Dc Linnell; Barbara Zimmermann; John Odden; Hans C Pedersen; Reidar Andersen; Arild Landa
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 6.528

9.  Biomass flow and scavengers use of carcasses after re-colonization of an apex predator.

Authors:  Camilla Wikenros; Håkan Sand; Per Ahlqvist; Olof Liberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Tracking neighbours promotes the coexistence of large carnivores.

Authors:  José Vicente López-Bao; Jenny Mattisson; Jens Persson; Malin Aronsson; Henrik Andrén
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.