Literature DB >> 18656830

Frequency distribution of weight loss percentage after gastric bypass and adjustable gastric banding.

Marc Bessler1, Amna Daud, Mary F DiGiorgi, Beth A Schrope, William B Inabnet, Daniel G Davis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The results of surgical procedures for weight loss are often described in terms of the percentage of excess weight lost. Expressing outcomes using the mean and standard deviation might not adequately describe the clinical experience. This could in part be because the use of the mean +/- standard deviation assumes a normal or random distribution of outcomes. It has been our perception that the weight loss results after gastric bypass are relatively normally and tightly distributed around the mean, making it relatively predictable. However, we have found that the results after adjustable gastric banding are more highly variable. In fact, there appears to be 2 groups of patients after this restrictive operation. One group, that is able to work well and does not struggle much against the restriction, accepts the limits that it imposes, and another group, that does not easily learn to deal with the restriction and hence mal-adapts.
METHODS: To evaluate the validity of our clinical perception, we undertook an analysis of the distribution of weight loss by the percentiles of excess weight lost. All patients with follow-up of > or =1 years after gastric bypass or adjustable banding were evaluated for this analysis. The demographics and percentage of excess weight loss were evaluated. The distribution of the percentage of excess weight loss in 10% increments was evaluated.
RESULTS: Both groups were similar with respect to the mean patient age. However, the patients in the gastric bypass group had had a significantly greater mean preoperative body mass index and were more likely to be women. As expected, the weight loss of the gastric bypass patients fell in a normal single-peak distribution for < or =5 years of follow-up. The data from the adjustable gastric band patients at 1 year demonstrated a normal single-peak distribution, with a longer rightward tail. At 2 and 3 years postoperatively, the data from the band patients had a 2-peaked curve.
CONCLUSION: The initial weight loss results after gastric banding are less predictable than those after gastric bypass. A similar analysis of long-term outcomes might be enlightening and assist in making clinical decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18656830     DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2008.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis        ISSN: 1550-7289            Impact factor:   4.734


  7 in total

1.  Total Weight Loss as the Outcome Measure of Choice After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

Authors:  Ricard Corcelles; Mena Boules; Dvir Froylich; Amani Hag; Christopher R Daigle; Ali Aminian; Stacy A Brethauer; Barto Burguera; Philip R Schauer
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 2.  A review of studies comparing three laparoscopic procedures in bariatric surgery: sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and adjustable gastric banding.

Authors:  Juan Victor A Franco; Pablo Adrian Ruiz; Mariano Palermo; Michel Gagner
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Roux en Y gastric bypass by single-incision mini-laparotomy: outcomes in 3,300 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Joseph A Caruana; Marc N McCabe; Audrey D Smith; Karen A Stawiasz; Eran Kabakov; Julia M Kabakov
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Weight Loss and Timing of J Tube Removal in Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch Patients Who Report Physical or Sexual Abuse.

Authors:  Polly A Hulme; Kevin A Kupzyk; Gary J Anthone; Kimberly A Capron; Thang Nguyen
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgical procedures for the treatment of severe obesity.

Authors:  Bruce C M Wang; Edwin S Wong; Rafael Alfonso-Cristancho; Hao He; David R Flum; David E Arterburn; Louis P Garrison; Sean D Sullivan
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-03-24

6.  Weight loss interventions for morbidly obese patients with compensated cirrhosis: a Markov decision analysis model.

Authors:  Bianca Bromberger; Paige Porrett; Rashikh Choudhury; Kristoffel Dumon; Kenric M Murayama
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Advantages of percent weight loss as a method of reporting weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Ida J Hatoum; Lee M Kaplan
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 5.002

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.