Literature DB >> 18655264

High relaxivity contrast agents in MR angiography of the carotid arteries.

Nicoletta Anzalone1, Roberta Scotti, Paolo Vezzulli.   

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) is one of the most practical diagnostic imaging modalities in the field of neurovascular imaging where risks associated with catheter angiography are high. Evaluation of the extracranial supraortic vessels, and in particular the carotid arteries, is the major field of application for MRA. Before the development of rapid contrast-enhanced (CE) acquisition sequences, the major limitations of MRA pertaining to the carotid arteries was the limited volume of study when 3D time-of-flight (TOF) images were acquired, and the saturation effects together with low spatial resolution and movement artifacts when 2D TOF images were acquired. Although technical improvements helped overcome some of these limitations, MRA was still not considered a valid diagnostic alternative to DSA for the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis until the advent of CE acquisitions. Most published studies on CE-MRA of the carotid arteries have been performed with standard gadolinium-based chelates which have similar r1 relaxivity values. Newer gadolinium chelates such as gadobenate dimeglumine (Multihance, Gd-BOPTA, Bracco) have higher intravascular r1 relaxivity than other agents such as Gd-DTPA. This leads to higher vascular peak enhancement of longer duration which has proven beneficial for improving vascular contrast. CE-MRA is today considered a highly suitable replacement for conventional MRA techniques and DSA for the evaluation of extracranial carotid artery disease. Compared with unenhanced MRA sequences, CE-MRA permits complete and reliable evaluation of the internal carotid artery from the bifurcation to the intracranial segment. Moreover, the technique offers better overall accuracy for the depiction of tight stenosis and more confident diagnosis of real carotid occlusion versus subocclusive stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 18655264     DOI: 10.1007/s10406-006-0193-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  4 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of colour Doppler ultrasonography, CT angiography and blood-pool-enhanced MR angiography in assessing carotid stenosis: a comparative study with DSA in 170 patients.

Authors:  M Anzidei; A Napoli; F Zaccagna; P Di Paolo; L Saba; B Cavallo Marincola; C Zini; G Cartocci; L Di Mare; C Catalano; R Passariello
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadodiamide in the evaluation of spinal vascular anatomy with MR angiography.

Authors:  M V Spampinato; S A Nguyen; Z Rumboldt
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  New dual mode gadolinium nanoparticle contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ketan B Ghaghada; Murali Ravoori; Divya Sabapathy; James Bankson; Vikas Kundra; Ananth Annapragada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Feasibility study of electrocardiographic and respiratory gated, gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of pulmonary veins and the impact of heart rate and rhythm on study quality.

Authors:  John D Groarke; Alfonso H Waller; Tomas S Vita; Gregory F Michaud; Marcelo F Di Carli; Ron Blankstein; Raymond Y Kwong; Michael Steigner
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 5.364

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.