Literature DB >> 18655149

Coronary pressure never lies.

Jacques J Koolen1, Nico H J Pijls.   

Abstract

Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR), calculated by coronary pressure measurement, is the invasive gold standard to assess the hemodynamic significance of a coronary stenosis. FFR reliably indicates whether a stenosis is responsible for inducible ischemia and if percutaneous coronary intervention is appropriate. False positive or negative FFR is rare. Occasionally, however, a clinical or angiographic condition is encountered in which in first instance the FFR measurement contradicts the intuitive feeling of the interventionalist. Further examination in such cases, however, often reveals a clear physiologic explanation and in this manner FFR "lifts the veil". Two such patients are presented in this case report and the reasons for apparent or actual false positive or negative FFR are discussed. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18655149     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.21528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  6 in total

1.  Differences between automatically detected and steady-state fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Tobias Härle; Sven Meyer; Felix Vahldiek; Albrecht Elsässer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: does coronary pressure never lie?

Authors:  Tim P van de Hoef; Martijn A van Lavieren; José P S Henriques; Jan J Piek; Bimmer E P M Claessen
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-04

3.  Prevalence, location, and extent of significant coronary artery disease in patients with normal myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Shu Yokota; Jan Paul Ottervanger; Mohamed Mouden; Jorik R Timmer; Siert Knollema; Pieter L Jager
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Long-term outcomes of fractional flow reserve-guided vs. angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary practice.

Authors:  Jing Li; Muhamad Y Elrashidi; Andreas J Flammer; Ryan J Lennon; Malcolm R Bell; David R Holmes; John F Bresnahan; Charanjit S Rihal; Lilach O Lerman; Amir Lerman
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Sex-related differences in fractional flow reserve-guided treatment.

Authors:  Jing Li; Charanjit S Rihal; Yoshiki Matsuo; Muhamad Y Elrashidi; Andreas J Flammer; Moo-Sik Lee; Andrew Cassar; Ryan J Lennon; Joerg Herrmann; Malcolm R Bell; David R Holmes; John F Bresnahan; Qi Hua; Lilach O Lerman; Amir Lerman
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 6.546

6.  Long-term outcome after deferred revascularization due to negative fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary lesions.

Authors:  Jerremy Weerts; Tobias Pustjens; Elsa Amin; Mustafa Ilhan; Leo F Veenstra; Ralph A L J Theunissen; Jindrich Vainer; Mera Stein; Lex A W Ruiters; Ben C G Gho; Arnoud W J Van't Hof; Saman Rasoul
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.