BACKGROUND: Throughout the final years of the twentieth century and into the beginning of the twenty-first, violence has been one of the main public health issues in Latin America, a region which has some of the highest mortality rates due to violence in the world. However, there seems to be an uneven geographical distribution of such instances. METHODS: We reviewed epidemiological data on violence globally and in Latin America, and here, we discuss differences between the Latin American countries in the context of a sociological framework as well as from a public health perspective. RESULTS: Our results indicate marked differences by country in terms of rates of violence. Countries such as Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica, and Uruguay, have low violence mortality rates; Peru, Nicaragua, Ecuador, Dominican Republic, Panama, and Paraguay have moderate rates, and Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, El Salvador, Honduras and Venezuela have high to extremely high mortality rates. Factors related to violence include social inequalities, lack of employment opportunities, urban segregation, a culture of masculinity, local drug markets, and the availability of firearms and widespread use of alcohol. CONCLUSION: The observed homicide variability between Latin American countries can be explained largely by differences in the countries' social contexts and political models. In those countries where homicide rates are extremely high, governments should review their current policies and take preventive actions. Fortunately increasingly nowadays there are promising advancements in that direction.
BACKGROUND: Throughout the final years of the twentieth century and into the beginning of the twenty-first, violence has been one of the main public health issues in Latin America, a region which has some of the highest mortality rates due to violence in the world. However, there seems to be an uneven geographical distribution of such instances. METHODS: We reviewed epidemiological data on violence globally and in Latin America, and here, we discuss differences between the Latin American countries in the context of a sociological framework as well as from a public health perspective. RESULTS: Our results indicate marked differences by country in terms of rates of violence. Countries such as Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica, and Uruguay, have low violence mortality rates; Peru, Nicaragua, Ecuador, Dominican Republic, Panama, and Paraguay have moderate rates, and Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, El Salvador, Honduras and Venezuela have high to extremely high mortality rates. Factors related to violence include social inequalities, lack of employment opportunities, urban segregation, a culture of masculinity, local drug markets, and the availability of firearms and widespread use of alcohol. CONCLUSION: The observed homicide variability between Latin American countries can be explained largely by differences in the countries' social contexts and political models. In those countries where homicide rates are extremely high, governments should review their current policies and take preventive actions. Fortunately increasingly nowadays there are promising advancements in that direction.
Authors: Nete Sloth Hansen-Nord; Finn Kjaerulf; Juan Almendarez; Victor Morales Rodas; Julio Castro Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2016-07-18 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Alvaro I Sánchez; Andrés Villaveces; Robert T Krafty; Taeyoung Park; Harold B Weiss; Anthony Fabio; Juan Carlos Puyana; María I Gutiérrez Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2011-03-30 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Sandhi M Barreto; Jaime J Miranda; J Peter Figueroa; Maria Inês Schmidt; Sergio Munoz; P Pablo Kuri-Morales; Jarbas B Silva Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2012-03-09 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Jose Daniel Charry; Juan Daniel Ochoa; Jorman Harvey Tejada; Sandra Liliana Navarro-Parra; Nicolas Esquivel; Yolercy Vasques Journal: Chin J Traumatol Date: 2017-06-19
Authors: Ruth Minamisava; Simonne S Nouer; Otaliba L de Morais Neto; Lícia Kamila Melo; Ana Lucia S S Andrade Journal: Int J Health Geogr Date: 2009-11-27 Impact factor: 3.918
Authors: Mark A Bellis; Nicola Leckenby; Karen Hughes; Chris Luke; Sacha Wyke; Zara Quigg Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-09-06 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Juanita A Haagsma; Nicholas Graetz; Ian Bolliger; Mohsen Naghavi; Hideki Higashi; Erin C Mullany; Semaw Ferede Abera; Jerry Puthenpurakal Abraham; Koranteng Adofo; Ubai Alsharif; Emmanuel A Ameh; Walid Ammar; Carl Abelardo T Antonio; Lope H Barrero; Tolesa Bekele; Dipan Bose; Alexandra Brazinova; Ferrán Catalá-López; Lalit Dandona; Rakhi Dandona; Paul I Dargan; Diego De Leo; Louisa Degenhardt; Sarah Derrett; Samath D Dharmaratne; Tim R Driscoll; Leilei Duan; Sergey Petrovich Ermakov; Farshad Farzadfar; Valery L Feigin; Richard C Franklin; Belinda Gabbe; Richard A Gosselin; Nima Hafezi-Nejad; Randah Ribhi Hamadeh; Martha Hijar; Guoqing Hu; Sudha P Jayaraman; Guohong Jiang; Yousef Saleh Khader; Ejaz Ahmad Khan; Sanjay Krishnaswami; Chanda Kulkarni; Fiona E Lecky; Ricky Leung; Raimundas Lunevicius; Ronan Anthony Lyons; Marek Majdan; Amanda J Mason-Jones; Richard Matzopoulos; Peter A Meaney; Wubegzier Mekonnen; Ted R Miller; Charles N Mock; Rosana E Norman; Ricardo Orozco; Suzanne Polinder; Farshad Pourmalek; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar; Amany Refaat; David Rojas-Rueda; Nobhojit Roy; David C Schwebel; Amira Shaheen; Saeid Shahraz; Vegard Skirbekk; Kjetil Søreide; Sergey Soshnikov; Dan J Stein; Bryan L Sykes; Karen M Tabb; Awoke Misganaw Temesgen; Eric Yeboah Tenkorang; Alice M Theadom; Bach Xuan Tran; Tommi J Vasankari; Monica S Vavilala; Vasiliy Victorovich Vlassov; Solomon Meseret Woldeyohannes; Paul Yip; Naohiro Yonemoto; Mustafa Z Younis; Chuanhua Yu; Christopher J L Murray; Theo Vos Journal: Inj Prev Date: 2015-12-03 Impact factor: 2.399