J M Llibre1, J R Santos, T Puig, J Moltó, L Ruiz, R Paredes, B Clotet. 1. Lluita contra la SIDA Foundation, Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Ctra de Canyet s/n, 08916 Badalona, Barcelona, Spain. jmllibre@flsida.org
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the expected activity of etravirine in clinical samples, according to mutational patterns associated with decreased virological response (VR). METHODS: We identified 1586 routine clinical samples with resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) to nevirapine and efavirenz (K103N 60%, Y181C 37%, G190A 27%, V108I 13%). Concerning in vitro identified etravirine mutations, samples with F227C, Y181I, M230L or L100I plus K103N plus Y181C were considered highly resistant. Samples with two RAMs plus Y181C or V179D or K101E or Y188L were considered intermediate. The prevalence of 13 RAMs recently associated with decreased VR to etravirine in the DUET clinical trials was also investigated. RESULTS: Most samples (69%) harboured more than one IAS-USA RAM to first-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs): 42% harboured two RAMs, 21% three RAMs and 6% four or more RAMs. The prevalence of 13 specific etravirine RAMs was V179F 0.12%, G190S 3.9%, Y181V 0.1%, V106I 2.6%, V179D 1.6%, K101P 2.0%, K101E 10.1%, Y181C 36.9%, A98G 5.9%, V90I 6.9%, Y181I 3.6%, G190A 27% and L100I 9.1%. The five RAMs with the most impact on VR (V179F/D, G190S, Y181V and V106I) occurred less often. Overall, 8.2% of the samples had three or more etravirine RAMs and only 1.1% had four or more. In addition, patterns of RAMs previously associated with intermediate etravirine resistance were present in 26.2% of the samples, whereas 4.85% displayed patterns of high-degree resistance. CONCLUSIONS: For RAMs associated with decreased VR, etravirine resistance in routine clinical samples was lower than previously reported. High-degree resistance was uncommon, even in patients with resistance to first-generation NNRTIs, whereas low-to-intermediate etravirine resistance was more common.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the expected activity of etravirine in clinical samples, according to mutational patterns associated with decreased virological response (VR). METHODS: We identified 1586 routine clinical samples with resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) to nevirapine and efavirenz (K103N 60%, Y181C 37%, G190A 27%, V108I 13%). Concerning in vitro identified etravirine mutations, samples with F227C, Y181I, M230L or L100I plus K103N plus Y181C were considered highly resistant. Samples with two RAMs plus Y181C or V179D or K101E or Y188L were considered intermediate. The prevalence of 13 RAMs recently associated with decreased VR to etravirine in the DUET clinical trials was also investigated. RESULTS: Most samples (69%) harboured more than one IAS-USA RAM to first-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs): 42% harboured two RAMs, 21% three RAMs and 6% four or more RAMs. The prevalence of 13 specific etravirine RAMs was V179F 0.12%, G190S 3.9%, Y181V 0.1%, V106I 2.6%, V179D 1.6%, K101P 2.0%, K101E 10.1%, Y181C 36.9%, A98G 5.9%, V90I 6.9%, Y181I 3.6%, G190A 27% and L100I 9.1%. The five RAMs with the most impact on VR (V179F/D, G190S, Y181V and V106I) occurred less often. Overall, 8.2% of the samples had three or more etravirine RAMs and only 1.1% had four or more. In addition, patterns of RAMs previously associated with intermediate etravirine resistance were present in 26.2% of the samples, whereas 4.85% displayed patterns of high-degree resistance. CONCLUSIONS: For RAMs associated with decreased VR, etravirine resistance in routine clinical samples was lower than previously reported. High-degree resistance was uncommon, even in patients with resistance to first-generation NNRTIs, whereas low-to-intermediate etravirine resistance was more common.
Authors: Eugene L Asahchop; Mark A Wainberg; Richard D Sloan; Cécile L Tremblay Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2012-06-25 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Weerawat Manosuthi; David M Butler; Wasun Chantratita; Chonlaphat Sukasem; Douglas D Richman; Davey M Smith Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Theodore D Ruel; Moses R Kamya; Pelin Li; William Pasutti; Edwin D Charlebois; Teri Liegler; Grant Dorsey; Philip J Rosenthal; Diane V Havlir; Joseph K Wong; Jane Achan Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2011-01-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Ming-Tain Lai; Vandna Munshi; Sinoeun Touch; Robert M Tynebor; Thomas J Tucker; Philip M McKenna; Theresa M Williams; Daniel J DiStefano; Daria J Hazuda; Michael D Miller Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2009-03-16 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Florence Doualla-Bell; Tendani Gaolathe; Ava Avalos; Suzanne Cloutier; Ndwapi Ndwapi; Christina Holcroft; Howard Moffat; Diana Dickinson; Max Essex; Mark A Wainberg; Madisa Mine Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2009-10-25 Impact factor: 5.396