Literature DB >> 18652744

Drug testing in oral fluid-evaluation of sample collection devices.

Kaarina Langel1, Charlotta Engblom, Anna Pehrsson, Teemu Gunnar, Kari Ariniemi, Pirjo Lillsunde.   

Abstract

Nine different oral fluid (OF) collection devices were studied to evaluate their suitability for collecting samples for drug analysis. The devices were Greiner Bio-One, Orasure Intercept, Immunalysis Quantisal, StatSure Saliva.Sampler, Cozart, Sarstedt Salivette, Malvern Medical OraCol, Acro Biotech Salicule, and Varian OraTube. For comparison, OF was also collected into plastic tubes. The volume of collected OF was quantified for samples collected both in vitro and from volunteers. Drug recovery was studied by collecting OF fortified at 1000 ng/mL with amphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, cocaine, Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol, morphine, codeine, diazepam, and alprazolam with the devices in vitro and analyzing the samples with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Recovery of ethanol was measured from 0.2% in OF by headspace gas chromatography-flame-ionization detection. The stability of drugs in the samples was studied by analyzing the samples after 0, 14, and 28 days storage. The study shows that there are substantial differences between the OF collection devices on the market. Some are well suited for collecting samples for toxicological analysis, but some give quite poor results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18652744     DOI: 10.1093/jat/32.6.393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anal Toxicol        ISSN: 0146-4760            Impact factor:   3.367


  22 in total

Review 1.  Saliva as a diagnostic fluid.

Authors:  Daniel Malamud
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2011-01

2.  Validation of an enzyme immunoassay for detection and semiquantification of cannabinoids in oral fluid.

Authors:  David M Schwope; Garry Milman; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Pharmacokinetics of cocaine and metabolites in human oral fluid and correlation with plasma concentrations after controlled administration.

Authors:  Karl B Scheidweiler; Erin A Kolbrich Spargo; Tamsin L Kelly; Edward J Cone; Allan J Barnes; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.681

Review 4.  Alternative matrices for therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressive agents using LC-MS/MS.

Authors:  Mwlod Ghareeb; Fatemeh Akhlaghi
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 5.  The potential role of oral fluid in antidoping testing.

Authors:  Sebastien Anizan; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 8.327

6.  High-throughput simultaneous analysis of buprenorphine, methadone, cocaine, opiates, nicotine, and metabolites in oral fluid by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Marta Concheiro; Teresa R Gray; Diaa M Shakleya; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 4.142

7.  Cannabinoid disposition in oral fluid after controlled cannabis smoking in frequent and occasional smokers.

Authors:  Matthew N Newmeyer; Nathalie A Desrosiers; Dayong Lee; Damodara R Mendu; Allan J Barnes; David A Gorelick; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Drug Test Anal       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.345

8.  A new ultraperformance-tandem mass spectrometry oral fluid assay for 29 illicit drugs and medications.

Authors:  Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  Impact of oral fluid collection device on cannabinoid stability following smoked cannabis.

Authors:  Sébastien Anizan; Mateus M Bergamaschi; Allan J Barnes; Garry Milman; Nathalie Desrosiers; Dayong Lee; David A Gorelick; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Drug Test Anal       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.345

10.  11-Nor-9-carboxy-∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol quantification in human oral fluid by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Karl B Scheidweiler; Sarah K Himes; Xiaohong Chen; Hua-Fen Liu; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 4.142

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.