Literature DB >> 18651614

The common house spider alters the material and mechanical properties of cobweb silk in response to different prey.

Cecilia Boutry1, Todd A Blackledge.   

Abstract

Many spiders depend upon webs to capture prey. Web function results from architecture and mechanical performance of the silk. We hypothesized that the common house spider, Achaearanea tepidariorum, would alter the mechanical performance of its cobweb in response to different prey by varying the structural and material properties of its silk. We fed spiders either large, high kinetic energy crickets or small, low kinetic energy pillbugs for 1 week and then examined their freshly spun silk. We separated mechanical performance into structural and material effects. We measured both types of properties for silk threads collected directly from cobwebs to test for "tuning" of silk performance to different aspects of prey capture. We compared silk from two different functional regions of the cobweb-sticky gumfooted threads that adhere directly to prey and supporting threads that maintain web integrity. Supporting threads from cricket-fed spiders were stiffer and tougher than supporting threads from pillbug-fed spiders. Both types of silk from cricket-fed spiders broke at higher loads than silk from pillbug-fed spiders. We explain this variation using a simple model of forces exerted by prey and spiders on single threads and propose potential mechanisms for this change in material properties. Two alternative, nonexclusive, hypotheses are suggested by our data. Spiders may tune silk to different types of prey by spinning threads that are able to hold prey without deforming permanently. Alternatively, as spider's body mass differed dramatically between the two feeding regimes, spiders may tune silk to their own body mass. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18651614     DOI: 10.1002/jez.487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol        ISSN: 1932-5223


  8 in total

Review 1.  High-performance spider webs: integrating biomechanics, ecology and behaviour.

Authors:  Aaron M T Harmer; Todd A Blackledge; Joshua S Madin; Marie E Herberstein
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  Developmental perspectives on personality: implications for ecological and evolutionary studies of individual differences.

Authors:  Judy A Stamps; Ton G G Groothuis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Bioprospecting finds the toughest biological material: extraordinary silk from a giant riverine orb spider.

Authors:  Ingi Agnarsson; Matjaz Kuntner; Todd A Blackledge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Plasticity in major ampullate silk production in relation to spider phylogeny and ecology.

Authors:  Cecilia Boutry; Milan Řezáč; Todd Alan Blackledge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Variation in protein intake induces variation in spider silk expression.

Authors:  Sean J Blamires; Chun-Lin Wu; I-Min Tso
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Small size does not confer male agility advantages in a sexually-size dimorphic spider.

Authors:  Shakira G Quiñones-Lebrón; Matjaž Gregorič; Matjaž Kuntner; Simona Kralj-Fišer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The common house spider, Parasteatoda tepidariorum, maintains silk gene expression on sub-optimal diet.

Authors:  Jeremy Miller; Jannelle Vienneau-Hathaway; Enkhbileg Dendev; Merrina Lan; Nadia A Ayoub
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Nutrient deprivation induces property variations in spider gluey silk.

Authors:  Sean J Blamires; Vasav Sahni; Ali Dhinojwala; Todd A Blackledge; I-Min Tso
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.