OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of simulating medical conditions on simulated patients (SPs). Main points of interest are influence on: perception of personal health and perception of their relation with the health care provider (HCP), personal well being. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with eight experienced, well-selected SPs involved in communication training at the medical faculty of Ghent University. Content of the data were analysed qualitatively. RESULTS: SPs believe that their medical knowledge improved, which changes their health-seeking behaviour. Simulating made SPs realize that being a doctor is difficult, making them more critical towards their own GP. SPs enjoy their work; they feel happy and content afterwards. Negative effects are stress, anxiety, exhaustion, dissatisfaction and sleeping problems. DISCUSSION: The perceived 'increased knowledge' leads to a different way of dealing with symptoms. It is positive that SPs are more critical towards their GP, this leads to a more equal relationship. The effects of stress and anxiety probably contribute positively to the performance. Dissatisfaction, anxiety and sleeping problems could be work-related and consequently occur in practicing other occupations. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Proper selection, preparation and guidance could minimize the problems encountered during simulation.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of simulating medical conditions on simulated patients (SPs). Main points of interest are influence on: perception of personal health and perception of their relation with the health care provider (HCP), personal well being. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with eight experienced, well-selected SPs involved in communication training at the medical faculty of Ghent University. Content of the data were analysed qualitatively. RESULTS:SPs believe that their medical knowledge improved, which changes their health-seeking behaviour. Simulating made SPs realize that being a doctor is difficult, making them more critical towards their own GP. SPs enjoy their work; they feel happy and content afterwards. Negative effects are stress, anxiety, exhaustion, dissatisfaction and sleeping problems. DISCUSSION: The perceived 'increased knowledge' leads to a different way of dealing with symptoms. It is positive that SPs are more critical towards their GP, this leads to a more equal relationship. The effects of stress and anxiety probably contribute positively to the performance. Dissatisfaction, anxiety and sleeping problems could be work-related and consequently occur in practicing other occupations. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Proper selection, preparation and guidance could minimize the problems encountered during simulation.