Literature DB >> 18649461

Reducing monitor units for robotic radiosurgery by optimized use of multiple collimators.

Johan J Pöll1, Mischa S Hoogeman, Jean-Briac Prévost, Joost J Nuyttens, Peter C Levendag, Ben J Heijmen.   

Abstract

Advances in image guidance and dose delivery techniques, and increased use of hypofractionation, have led to prolonged radiotherapy fraction duration. This is also the case with robotic radiosurgery, as extensive on-line image guidance procedures, many beams, and usually high fraction doses are used for tumor irradiation. At this institution, early stage non-small-cell lung cancer patients are treated with image guided tumor tracking for respiratory motion compensation. Approximately 130 circular beams and up to approximately 39 000 monitor units (MUs) are used for delivery of a total treatment dose of 60 Gy. The large number of MUs leads to long treatment times and the radiation leakage increases with the number of MUs. Generally, per patient, a single (small) cone is used. To substantially reduce the number of MUs, the authors have developed a new planning strategy for combined use of a small and a large cone. The large cone aims at dose delivery around the PTV center, while the small cone shapes the dose around the (irregular) PTV edges. The authors systematically investigated relationships between the number of MUs, the plan quality, the selected cone diameters, and the beam-direction setup. Plan quality was assessed with the conformity index, mean lung dose (MLD), V20 of the lungs, and by visual inspection. The reduction in MUs was determined by comparing two-cone plans with corresponding one-cone plans that yielded equal MLD, i.e., equal predicted lung toxicity. With the proposed two-cone approach, the required number of MUs reduced by on average 31% (range 4%-56%). The beam-on time per treatment fraction reduced by on average 8 min (range 1-15.2 min). All plans obeyed the clinically applied constraints and were considered clinically acceptable by an involved physician.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18649461     DOI: 10.1118/1.2919090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of quality of life after stereotactic body radiotherapy and surgery for early-stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alan Katz; Montserrat Ferrer; José Francisco Suárez
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 3.481

2.  A phantom study to determine the optimum size of a single collimator for shortening the treatment time in CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery of spherical targets.

Authors:  Sudahar Harikrishnaperumal; Gopalakrishna Kurup; Murali Venkatraman; Velmurugan Jagadeesan
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  A method to improve dose gradient for robotic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Tianfang Li; Cihat Ozhasoglu; Steven Burton; John Flickinger; Dwight E Heron; M Saiful Huq
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Plan Quality and Secondary Cancer Risk Assessment in Patients with Benign Intracranial Lesions after Radiosurgery using the CyberKnife M6 Robotic Radiosurgery System.

Authors:  Jen-Hong Lan; Chin-Shiuh Shieh; Chao-Hong Liu; I-Chun Cho; I-Hsing Tsai; Long-Chun Chen; Pei-Ju Chao; Hsiao-Fei Lee; Yu-Jie Huang; Tsair-Fwu Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Applying pytorch toolkit to plan optimization for circular cone based robotic radiotherapy.

Authors:  Bin Liang; Ran Wei; Jianghu Zhang; Yongbao Li; Tao Yang; Shouping Xu; Ke Zhang; Wenlong Xia; Bin Guo; Bo Liu; Fugen Zhou; Qiuwen Wu; Jianrong Dai
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 4.309

6.  Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of CyberKnife M6™ InCise multileaf collimator over IRIS™ variable collimator in prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Authors:  Vindu Kathriarachchi; Charles Shang; Grant Evans; Theodora Leventouri; Georgios Kalantzis
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

7.  Radiation shielding evaluation based on five years of data from a busy CyberKnife center.

Authors:  Jun Yang; Jing Feng
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Improving plan quality and consistency by standardization of dose constraints in prostate cancer patients treated with CyberKnife.

Authors:  Martina Descovich; Mauro Carrara; Sara Morlino; Dilini S Pinnaduwage; Daniel Saltiel; Jean Pouliot; Marc B Nash; Emanuele Pignoli; Riccardo Valdagni; Mack Roach; Alexander R Gottschalk
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Dosimetric comparison between cone/Iris-based and InCise MLC-based CyberKnife plans for single and multiple brain metastases.

Authors:  Si Young Jang; Ron Lalonde; Cihat Ozhasoglu; Steven Burton; Dwight Heron; M Saiful Huq
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  A new plan quality objective function for determining optimal collimator combinations in prostate cancer treatment with stereotactic body radiation therapy using CyberKnife.

Authors:  Maria Varnava; Iori Sumida; Hirokazu Mizuno; Hiroya Shiomi; Osamu Suzuki; Yasuo Yoshioka; Kazuhiko Ogawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.