PURPOSE: To evaluate the acute effects of sildenafil (50 mg) on the micturation of men with erectile dysfunction (ED) and concomitant benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) using uroflowmetric parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 68 male patients randomized into two groups (36 treatment, 32 control groups) withInternational Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) greater than 7 and International Index of Erectile Dysfunction-erectile function domain score lower than 26 were enrolled in the study. Patients in the treatment group received a single dose of 50 mg of oral sildenafil. Patients in the control group received no treatment. Prevoiding urine volumes determined ultrasonographically and voided urine volumes were also recorded. Statistical comparisons were made with the use of analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: Mean ages were similar between treatment and control groups (60.4 +/- 9.8 and 58.6 +/- 8.3 years, respectively, P = 0.430). In the treatment group the maximum and average flow rates increased significantly (Q (max) from 15.6 +/- 6.8 cc/s to 19.3 +/- 7.2 cc/s, P < 0.0001; Q (avg) from 7.3 +/- 3.0 cc/s to 9.1 +/- 3.0 cc/s, P < 0.0001) with sildenafil administration, while other parameters studied remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: Despite the limitations of variations of uroflowmetry, this study showed that sildenafil improves Q (max) and Q (avg) in patients suffering from ED with concomitant BPH-LUTS. Long-term studies are needed to evaluate the effects on IPSS, side effects, and drug interactions.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To evaluate the acute effects of sildenafil (50 mg) on the micturation of men with erectile dysfunction (ED) and concomitant benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) using uroflowmetric parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 68 male patients randomized into two groups (36 treatment, 32 control groups) with International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) greater than 7 and International Index of Erectile Dysfunction-erectile function domain score lower than 26 were enrolled in the study. Patients in the treatment group received a single dose of 50 mg of oral sildenafil. Patients in the control group received no treatment. Prevoiding urine volumes determined ultrasonographically and voided urine volumes were also recorded. Statistical comparisons were made with the use of analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: Mean ages were similar between treatment and control groups (60.4 +/- 9.8 and 58.6 +/- 8.3 years, respectively, P = 0.430). In the treatment group the maximum and average flow rates increased significantly (Q (max) from 15.6 +/- 6.8 cc/s to 19.3 +/- 7.2 cc/s, P < 0.0001; Q (avg) from 7.3 +/- 3.0 cc/s to 9.1 +/- 3.0 cc/s, P < 0.0001) with sildenafil administration, while other parameters studied remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: Despite the limitations of variations of uroflowmetry, this study showed that sildenafil improves Q (max) and Q (avg) in patients suffering from ED with concomitant BPH-LUTS. Long-term studies are needed to evaluate the effects on IPSS, side effects, and drug interactions.
Authors: Shaohua Chang; Joseph A Hypolite; Stephen A Zderic; Alan J Wein; Samuel Chacko; Michael E DiSanto Journal: J Urol Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Kevin T McVary; Claus G Roehrborn; Jed C Kaminetsky; Stephen M Auerbach; Barton Wachs; Jay M Young; Anne Esler; Gregory D Sides; Bela S Denes Journal: J Urol Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Smita Pattanaik; Ravimohan S Mavuduru; Arabind Panda; Joseph L Mathew; Mayank M Agarwal; Eu Chang Hwang; Jennifer A Lyon; Shrawan K Singh; Arup K Mandal Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-11-16