Literature DB >> 18648998

Kinetics of immune response to foot-and-mouth disease virus (type Asia 1) in experimental cattle.

Mohan S Maddur1, M S Mohan, M R Gajendragad, Subodh Kishore, S Gopalakrishna, Nem Singh.   

Abstract

Humoral and mucosal (secretory antibody)immune response to FMDV type Asia 1 in cattle was analyzed after vaccination and infection using virus neutralizing test (VNT). Vaccination (1/16th the usual dose) failed to protect cattle from generalized clinical disease following experimental FMDV Asia 1 infection. Our results showed that infection induced higher and prolonged serum antibody titres indicating antigen mass is important for optimal immune response. Experimental FMDV infection induced significant secretory antibody (mucosal) response in cattle. Though, there was no difference in the serum antibody response between the cattle that developed generalized infection (unprotected) and those with only localized infection (protected), secretory antibody response differed, wherein the unprotected cattle had higher secretory response than protected cattle. Thus, FMDV Asia 1 infection stimulates a similar serum antibody response and a unique secretory antibody response among the infected cattle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18648998     DOI: 10.1007/s11259-008-9076-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Res Commun        ISSN: 0165-7380            Impact factor:   2.459


  12 in total

1.  Induction of mucosal immunity by inactivated poliovirus vaccine is dependent on previous mucosal contact with live virus.

Authors:  T M Herremans; J H Reimerink; A M Buisman; T G Kimman; M P Koopmans
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 2.  The pathogenesis and diagnosis of foot-and-mouth disease.

Authors:  S Alexandersen; Z Zhang; A I Donaldson; A J M Garland
Journal:  J Comp Pathol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.311

3.  Comparison of the immune response elicited by infectious and inactivated foot-and-mouth disease virus in mice.

Authors:  P G Piatti; A Berinstein; O J Lopez; M V Borca; F Fernandez; A A Schudel; A M Sadir
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.891

4.  Secretory antibody responses in cattle infected with foot-and-mouth disease virus.

Authors:  M Matsumoto; P D McKercher; K E Nusbaum
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 1.156

5.  Recognition of foot-and-mouth disease virus and its capsid protein VP1 by bovine peripheral T lymphocytes.

Authors:  M Garcia-Valcarcel; T Doel; T Collen; M Ryan; R M Parkhouse
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.891

Review 6.  The carrier state in foot and mouth disease--an immunological review.

Authors:  J S Salt
Journal:  Br Vet J       Date:  1993 May-Jun

7.  Comparative immunogenecity of foot and mouth disease virus antigens in FMD-haemorrhagic septicaemia combined vaccine and FMD vaccine alone in buffalo calves.

Authors:  Rajesh Chhabra; R Sharma; N K Kakker
Journal:  Indian J Exp Biol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 0.818

8.  Antibody response in bovine pharyngeal fluid following foot-and-mouth disease vaccination and, or, exposure to live virus.

Authors:  M J Francis; E J Ouldridge; L Black
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 2.534

Review 9.  Protective immune response against foot-and-mouth disease.

Authors:  K C McCullough; F De Simone; E Brocchi; L Capucci; J R Crowther; U Kihm
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  Secretory IgA as an indicator of oro-pharyngeal foot-and-mouth disease virus replication and as a tool for post vaccination surveillance.

Authors:  Satya Parida; John Anderson; Sarah J Cox; Paul V Barnett; David J Paton
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 3.641

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.