Literature DB >> 18648598

Radiation, ecology and the invalid LNT model: the evolutionary imperative.

Peter A Parsons1.   

Abstract

Metabolic and energetic efficiency, and hence fitness of organisms to survive, should be maximal in their habitats. This tenet of evolutionary biology invalidates the linear-no threshold (LNT) model for the risk consequences of environmental agents. Hormesis in response to selection for maximum metabolic and energetic efficiency, or minimum metabolic imbalance, to adapt to a stressed world dominated by oxidative stress should therefore be universal. Radiation hormetic zones extending substantially beyond common background levels, can be explained by metabolic interactions among multiple abiotic stresses. Demographic and experimental data are mainly in accord with this expectation. Therefore, non-linearity becomes the primary model for assessing risks from low-dose ionizing radiation. This is the evolutionary imperative upon which risk assessment for radiation should be based.

Keywords:  Chernobyl; LNT model; adaptation; background radiation; ecology; environmental stress; evolutionary expectation; hormesis; metabolic efficiency; oxidative stress; radiation

Year:  2006        PMID: 18648598      PMCID: PMC2477689          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.05-028.Parsons

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  20 in total

Review 1.  The nutrient-toxin dosage continuum in human evolution and modern health.

Authors:  L M Gerber; G C Williams; S J Gray
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.875

Review 2.  Biologic responses to low doses of ionizing radiation: Detriment versus hormesis. Part 2. Dose responses of organisms.

Authors:  M Pollycove; L E Feinendegen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  Genetics and the specificity of the aging process.

Authors:  Siegfried Hekimi; Leonard Guarente
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-02-28       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Toxicology rethinks its central belief.

Authors:  Edward J Calabrese; Linda A Baldwin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  What doesn't kill you makes you stronger. A new model for risk assessment may not only revolutionize the field of toxicology, but also have vast implications for risk assessment.

Authors:  Caroline Hadley
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  Lifespan extension of Drosophila melanogaster through hormesis by repeated mild heat stress.

Authors:  Miriam J Hercus; Volker Loeschcke; Suresh I S Rattan
Journal:  Biogerontology       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.277

7.  Multiple-stress analysis for isolation of Drosophila longevity genes.

Authors:  Horng-Dar Wang; Parsa Kazemi-Esfarjani; Seymour Benzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Aging, anti-aging, and hormesis.

Authors:  Suresh I S Rattan
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.432

Review 9.  Hormesis: an adaptive expectation with emphasis on ionizing radiation.

Authors:  P A Parsons
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.446

10.  Energy, stress and the invalid linear no-threshold premise: a generalization illustrated by ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Peter A Parsons
Journal:  Biogerontology       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.277

View more
  1 in total

1.  Prospectus. Survival across the fitness-stress continuum under the ecological stress theory of aging: caloric restriction and ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Peter A Parsons
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 2.658

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.