Literature DB >> 18648590

Radiation-induced bystander and adaptive responses in cell and tissue models.

Kevin M Prise1, Melvyn Folkard, Barry D Michael.   

Abstract

The use of microbeam approaches has been a major advance in probing the relevance of bystander and adaptive responses in cell and tissue models. Our own studies at the Gray Cancer Institute have used both a charged particle microbeam, producing protons and helium ions and a soft X-ray microprobe, delivering focused carbon-K, aluminium-K and titanium-K soft X-rays. Using these techniques we have been able to build up a comprehensive picture of the underlying differences between bystander responses and direct effects in cell and tissue-like models. What is now clear is that bystander dose-response relationships, the underlying mechanisms of action and the targets involved are not the same as those observed for direct irradiation of DNA in the nucleus. Our recent studies have shown bystander responses even when radiation is deposited away from the nucleus in cytoplasmic targets. Also the interaction between bystander and adaptive responses may be a complex one related to dose, number of cells targeted and time interval.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 18648590      PMCID: PMC2477681          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.06-113.Prise

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  47 in total

1.  Evidence for pronounced bystander effects caused by nonuniform distributions of radioactivity using a novel three-dimensional tissue culture model.

Authors:  A Bishayee; D V Rao; R W Howell
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Bystander-induced apoptosis and premature differentiation in primary urothelial explants after charged particle microbeam irradiation.

Authors:  O V Belyakov; M Folkard; C Mothersill; K M Prise; B D Michael
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Induction of sister chromatid exchanges by extremely low doses of alpha-particles.

Authors:  H Nagasawa; J B Little
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  A charged-particle microbeam: II. A single-particle micro-collimation and detection system.

Authors:  M Folkard; B Vojnovic; K J Hollis; A G Bowey; S J Watts; G Schettino; K M Prise; B D Michael
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.694

5.  Alpha-particle-induced sister chromatid exchange in normal human lung fibroblasts: evidence for an extranuclear target.

Authors:  A Deshpande; E H Goodwin; S M Bailey; B L Marrone; B E Lehnert
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Effect of 239PuO2 particle number and size on the frequency and distribution of chromosome aberrations in the liver of the Chinese hamster.

Authors:  A L Brooks; J C Retherford; R O McClellan
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Cell-cell contact during gamma irradiation is not required to induce a bystander effect in normal human keratinocytes: evidence for release during irradiation of a signal controlling survival into the medium.

Authors:  C Mothersill; C B Seymour
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  In-field and out-of-field effects in partial volume lung irradiation in rodents: possible correlation between early dna damage and functional endpoints.

Authors:  V V Moiseenko; J J Battista; R P Hill; E L Travis; J Van Dyk
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Free radical-initiated and gap junction-mediated bystander effect due to nonuniform distribution of incorporated radioactivity in a three-dimensional tissue culture model.

Authors:  A Bishayee; H Z Hill; D Stein; D V Rao; R W Howell
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 10.  Reactive oxygen species, chromosome mutation, and cancer: possible role of clastogenic factors in carcinogenesis.

Authors:  I Emerit
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 7.376

View more
  5 in total

1.  Radiation induced bystander effects in mice given low doses of radiation in vivo.

Authors:  Harleen Singh; Rohin Saroya; Richard Smith; Rebecca Mantha; Lynda Guindon; Ron E J Mitchel; Colin Seymour; Carmel Mothersill
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Investigation into the radiobiological consequences of pre-treatment verification imaging with megavoltage X-rays in radiotherapy.

Authors:  W B Hyland; S J McMahon; K T Butterworth; A J Cole; R B King; K M Redmond; K M Prise; A R Hounsell; C K McGarry
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Occurrence of ²¹⁰Po and biological effects of low-level exposure: the need for research.

Authors:  Ralph L Seiler; Joseph L Wiemels
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  A preclinical microbeam facility with a conventional x-ray tube.

Authors:  Stefan Bartzsch; Craig Cummings; Stephan Eismann; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Ceramide-Enriched Membrane Domains Contribute to Targeted and Nontargeted Effects of Radiation through Modulation of PI3K/AKT Signaling in HNSCC Cells.

Authors:  Riad Ladjohounlou; Safa Louati; Alexandra Lauret; Arnaud Gauthier; Dominique Ardail; Nicolas Magne; Gersende Alphonse; Claire Rodriguez-Lafrasse
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.