Literature DB >> 18648058

Microbial ecology shifts in the ileum of broilers during feed withdrawal and dietary manipulations.

K Thompson1, K Burkholder, J Patterson, T J Applegate.   

Abstract

Broilers are withheld from feed for 8 to 24 h before processing to empty the gastrointestinal tract and reduce potential carcass contamination from gastrointestinal tract contents. Intestinal microbial changes during feed withdrawal (FW) have not been thoroughly defined. Two experiments were conducted to examine the effects of diet and FW on the microbial ecology in the small intestine. In experiment 1, 42-d-old broilers were fed diets containing no additive (control), 250 ppm of CuSO(4), or bacitracin (BMD; 30 ppm) and were also subjected to FW for 0, 10, and 24 h. Six birds from each dietary treatment were killed at each FW time point and ileal mucosa and digesta were collected. Microbial communities were determined by isolating bacterial DNA, amplifying the V3 region of 16S ribosomal DNA, and performing denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. The mucosal microbial profiles from birds at 0 h of FW had higher similarity values than those at 24 h of FW, indicating that as FW time increased, uniformity of intestinal microbial populations decreased. Numbers of bands (an indicator of numbers of bacterial species present) at 0 h (9.38) were greater than those at 10 and 24 h (5.39 and 5.78, respectively), suggesting a reduction in microbial species and diversity as FW time increased. Copper-fed birds had greater similarity coefficients than either the control or BMD-fed birds, but BMD-fed birds had greater band numbers. No interaction between diet and FW was observed and no digesta differences were observed. In experiment 2, 62-d-old birds fed corn-soy diets in floor pens were subjected to 0, 8, 12, and 24 h of FW. Ileal mucosal tissue was collected and analyzed as in experiment 1. Mucosal microbiota similarities were greater at 0 h of FW than at 8, 12, or 24 h of FW and band numbers were reduced between 0 and 24 h of FW. Data from these studies suggest that FW and dietary treatments alter the microbial community of the intestine by decreasing bacterial diversity in the ileum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18648058     DOI: 10.3382/ps.2007-00324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  8 in total

Review 1.  Effects of heat stress on the gut health of poultry.

Authors:  Marcos H Rostagno
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Recombinant expression of two bacteriophage proteins that lyse clostridium perfringens and share identical sequences in the C-terminal cell wall binding domain of the molecules but are dissimilar in their N-terminal active domains.

Authors:  Mustafa Simmons; David M Donovan; Gregory R Siragusa; Bruce S Seal
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 5.279

3.  Microbiota and Transcriptomic Effects of an Essential Oil Blend and Its Delivery Route Compared to an Antibiotic Growth Promoter in Broiler Chickens.

Authors:  Samson Oladokun; K Fraser Clark; Deborah I Adewole
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-04-21

Review 4.  Recent Advances in Understanding the Influence of Zinc, Copper, and Manganese on the Gastrointestinal Environment of Pigs and Poultry.

Authors:  Leon J Broom; Alessandra Monteiro; Arturo Piñon
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Temporal Relationships Exist Between Cecum, Ileum, and Litter Bacterial Microbiomes in a Commercial Turkey Flock, and Subtherapeutic Penicillin Treatment Impacts Ileum Bacterial Community Establishment.

Authors:  Jessica L Danzeisen; Jonathan B Clayton; Hu Huang; Dan Knights; Brian McComb; Shivdeep S Hayer; Timothy J Johnson
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2015-11-20

Review 6.  Host and Environmental Factors Affecting the Intestinal Microbiota in Chickens.

Authors:  Jannigje G Kers; Francisca C Velkers; Egil A J Fischer; Gerben D A Hermes; J A Stegeman; Hauke Smidt
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 7.  The functionality of the gastrointestinal microbiome in non-human animals.

Authors:  Irene Hanning; Sandra Diaz-Sanchez
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 14.650

Review 8.  Centennial Review: Factors affecting the chicken gastrointestinal microbial composition and their association with gut health and productive performance.

Authors:  Yugal Raj Bindari; Priscilla F Gerber
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2021-11-21       Impact factor: 3.352

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.