Literature DB >> 18647899

Comparison of fetal biometric values with sonographic and 3D reconstruction MRI in term gestations.

Mustapha R Hatab1, Michael V Zaretsky, James M Alexander, Diane M Twickler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the fetal biometric values head and abdominal circumferences, biparietal and occipital-frontal diameters, and left and right ventricular atrial diameters obtained with contemporaneous sonography and 3D MRI reconstructions in term pregnancies. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 107 nulliparous women evaluated as having uncomplicated pregnancies and scheduled for induction at 42 completed weeks gave their informed consent and underwent MRI and sonography within 3 hours of each other. Two single-shot fast spin-echo MRI sequences were performed with 7- and 4-mm slice thicknesses and no gap. A single observer performed MRI postprocessing to obtain biometric values. A single sonographer using a 3- to 5-MHz curvilinear transducer performed transabdominal sonography. Concordance correlation and Bland-Altman analysis of differences were performed.
RESULTS: Concordance correlation was poor for both right (0.024) and left (0.005) ventricular atrial diameters. There were moderate concordance correlations for head (0.56) and abdominal (0.53) circumferences and biparietal diameter (0.61). Occipital-frontal diameter had fair correlation (0.27).
CONCLUSION: Comparison between contemporaneous sonographic and 3D reconstructed MR images at late gestational ages shows acceptable correlation between the two techniques for head circumference, abdominal circumference, and biparietal diameter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18647899     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.2623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  7 in total

Review 1.  The growing role of MR imaging in the fetus.

Authors:  Judy A Estroff
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-04

2.  Fetal MRI: A Technical Update with Educational Aspirations.

Authors:  Ali Gholipour; Judith A Estroff; Carol E Barnewolt; Richard L Robertson; P Ellen Grant; Borjan Gagoski; Simon K Warfield; Onur Afacan; Susan A Connolly; Jeffrey J Neil; Adam Wolfberg; Robert V Mulkern
Journal:  Concepts Magn Reson Part A Bridg Educ Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 0.481

3.  Intersection based motion correction of multislice MRI for 3-D in utero fetal brain image formation.

Authors:  Kio Kim; Piotr A Habas; Francois Rousseau; Orit A Glenn; Anthony J Barkovich; Colin Studholme
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  A comparison of ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of fetal biometry and weight in the second trimester of pregnancy: An observer agreement and variability study.

Authors:  Jacqueline Matthew; Christina Malamateniou; Caroline L Knight; Kelly P Baruteau; Tara Fletcher; Alice Davidson; Laura McCabe; Dharmintra Pasupathy; Mary Rutherford
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2018-01-29

5.  Fetal biometry for guiding the medical management of women with gestational diabetes mellitus for improving maternal and perinatal health.

Authors:  Ujvala Rao; Bradley de Vries; Glynis P Ross; Adrienne Gordon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-09-03

6.  A Preliminary Study of Three-dimensional Sonographic Measurements of the Fetus.

Authors:  Udi Ergaz; Israel Goldstein; Michael Divon; Zeev Weiner
Journal:  Rambam Maimonides Med J       Date:  2015-04-29

7.  Pictorial essay: MRI of the fetal brain.

Authors:  Ganesh Rao B; Bs Ramamurthy
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2009-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.