Literature DB >> 18647845

Premedication to reduce discomfort during screening mammography.

Colleen K Lambertz1, Christopher J Johnson, Paul G Montgomery, James R Maxwell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that premedication with acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and/or 4% lidocaine gel would decrease discomfort and improve satisfaction with screening mammography in women who expect a higher level of discomfort.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved, prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial, 418 women aged 32-89 years who expected substantial discomfort with screening mammography were randomly divided to receive premedication with acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and/or 4% lidocaine gel. Subjects provided informed written consent. The primary outcome was discomfort. Secondary outcomes were satisfaction and plans for future mammography on the basis of discomfort. Subjects completed structured questionnaires with visual analog scales to measure discomfort and satisfaction. A generalized linear mixed-models framework was used to assess the effect of medications on discomfort during mammography, and satisfaction with technologist and machine combinations was included as a random effect. The "plans for mammography next year" outcome was modeled by using a binary distribution and logit link function.
RESULTS: Discomfort was significantly lower in the lidocaine gel group (P = .01). Satisfaction was significantly negatively correlated with discomfort (P < .001). Satisfaction and whether or not the subject had delayed her mammography because of fear of discomfort had significant effects on plans to undergo mammography next year (P < .001 for both). There were significant differences in discomfort between different combinations of technologists and machines.
CONCLUSION: Premedication with 4% lidocaine gel significantly reduced discomfort during screening mammography, and reduced discomfort may improve the likelihood of future mammographic screening and early detection of breast cancer. RSNA, 2008

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18647845     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2482071490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  8 in total

1.  How to make screening mammography less uncomfortable.

Authors:  George D Lundberg
Journal:  Medscape J Med       Date:  2008-11-20

2.  Barriers and facilitators related to mammography use among lower educated Mexican women in the USA.

Authors:  Silvia Tejeda; Beti Thompson; Gloria D Coronado; Diane P Martin
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Toxicity of topical lidocaine applied to the breasts to reduce discomfort during screening mammography.

Authors:  Colleen K Lambertz; Christopher J Johnson; Paul G Montgomery; James R Maxwell; Stefanie J Fry
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-04

4.  Pain-preventing strategies in mammography: an observational study of simultaneously recorded pain and breast mechanics throughout the entire breast compression cycle.

Authors:  Jerry E de Groot; Mireille J M Broeders; Cornelis A Grimbergen; Gerard J den Heeten
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  Client and practitioner perspectives on the screening mammography experience.

Authors:  P Whelehan; A Evans; G Ozakinci
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.520

6.  A New Technical Mode in Mammography: Self-Compression Improves Satisfaction.

Authors:  Sıla Ulus; Özge Kovan; Aydan Arslan; Pınar Elpen; Erkin Arıbal
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2019-06-17

7.  Female patients' perception of pain caused by mammography in the Western Region of Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Laila K Ashkar; Yasmeen H Zaki
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.484

8.  Temporal Adjusters Can Reduce Pain During the Video Head Impulse Test for Patients With Mongoloid Facial Features, Without Increasing the Slippage-Induced Artifacts.

Authors:  Satoshi Takahashi; Takenori Miyashita; Ryuhei Inamoto; Yohei Ouchi; Shinjiro Fukuda; Izumi Koizuka; Hiroshi Hoshikawa
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 1.017

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.