Literature DB >> 18646436

Qualification of a quantitative laryngeal imaging system using videostroboscopy and videokymography.

Peter S Popolo1, Ingo R Titze.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether full-cycle glottal width measurements could be obtained with a quantitative laryngeal imaging system using videostroboscopy, and whether glottal width and vocal fold length measurements were repeatable and reliable.
METHODS: Synthetic vocal folds were phonated on a laboratory bench, and dynamic images were obtained in repeated trials by use of videostroboscopy and videokymography (VKG) with an imaging system equipped with a 2-point laser projection device for measuring absolute dimensions. Video images were also obtained with an industrial videoscope system with a built-in laser measurement capability. Maximum glottal width and vocal fold length were compared among these 3 methods.
RESULTS: The average variation in maximum glottal width measurements between stroboscopic data and VKG data was 3.10%. The average variations in width measurements between the clinical system and the industrial system were 1.93% (stroboscopy) and 3.49% (VKG). The variations in vocal fold length were similarly small. The standard deviations across trials were 0.29 mm for width and 0.48 mm for length (stroboscopy), 0.18 mm for width (VKG), and 0.25 mm for width and 0.84 mm for length (industrial).
CONCLUSIONS: For stable, periodic vibration, the full extent of the glottal width can be reliably measured with the quantitative videostroboscopy system.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18646436      PMCID: PMC2538379          DOI: 10.1177/000348940811700602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol        ISSN: 0003-4894            Impact factor:   1.547


  8 in total

1.  High-precision measurement of the vocal fold length and vibratory amplitudes.

Authors:  Stefan Schuberth; Ulrich Hoppe; Michael Döllinger; Jörg Lohscheller; Ulrich Eysholdt
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Laryngeal morphometry with a new laser 'clip on' device.

Authors:  Goetz Schade; Rudolf Leuwer; Mathias Kraas; Bernhard Rassow; Markus M Hess
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.025

3.  Calibration of high-speed imaging by laser triangulation.

Authors:  Hans Larsson; Stellan Hertegård
Journal:  Logoped Phoniatr Vocol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.487

4.  Aerodynamic transfer of energy to the vocal folds.

Authors:  Scott L Thomson; Luc Mongeau; Steven H Frankel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Comparison of a flexible laryngoscope with calibrated sizing function to intraoperative measurements.

Authors:  James B Kobler; David I Rosen; James A Burns; Lee M Akst; Matthew S Broadhurst; Steven M Zeitels; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.547

6.  Videokymography: high-speed line scanning of vocal fold vibration.

Authors:  J G Svec; H K Schutte
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Assessment of vocal function using simultaneous aerodynamic and calibrated videostroboscopic measures.

Authors:  J B Kobler; R E Hillman; S M Zeitels; J Kuo
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.547

8.  Videostroboscopic evaluation of the larynx.

Authors:  D M Bless; M Hirano; R J Feder
Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 1.697

  8 in total
  10 in total

1.  Flow-induced vibratory response of idealized versus magnetic resonance imaging-based synthetic vocal fold models.

Authors:  Brian A Pickup; Scott L Thomson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Advances in laryngeal imaging.

Authors:  Antanas Verikas; Virgilijus Uloza; Marija Bacauskiene; Adas Gelzinis; Edgaras Kelertas
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-07-19       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Comparison of Vocal Vibration-Dose Measures for Potential-Damage Risk Criteria.

Authors:  Ingo R Titze; Eric J Hunter
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Vibratory responses of synthetic, self-oscillating vocal fold models.

Authors:  Preston R Murray; Scott L Thomson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  In Vivo measurement of pediatric vocal fold motion using structured light laser projection.

Authors:  Rita R Patel; Kevin D Donohue; Daniel Lau; Harikrishnan Unnikrishnan
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Synthetic, multi-layer, self-oscillating vocal fold model fabrication.

Authors:  Preston R Murray; Scott L Thomson
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 7.  State of the art laryngeal imaging: research and clinical implications.

Authors:  Dimitar D Deliyski; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.064

8.  Laser projection imaging for measurement of pediatric voice.

Authors:  Rita R Patel; Kevin D Donohue; Weston C Johnson; Sanford M Archer
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  A synthetic, self-oscillating vocal fold model platform for studying augmentation injection.

Authors:  Preston R Murray; Scott L Thomson; Marshall E Smith
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  In vitro experimental investigation of voice production.

Authors:  Stefan Kniesburges; Scott L Thomson; Anna Barney; Michael Triep; Petr Sidlof; Jaromír Horáčcek; Christoph Brücker; Stefan Becker
Journal:  Curr Bioinform       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.543

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.