Literature DB >> 18646254

A comparison of hospital performance with non-ignorable missing covariates: an application to trauma care data.

Jamie J Kirkham1.   

Abstract

Trauma is a term used in medicine for describing physical injury. The prospective evaluation of the care of injured patients aims to improve the management of a trauma system and acts as an ongoing audit of trauma care. One of the principal techniques used to evaluate the effectiveness of trauma care at different hospitals is through a comparative outcome analysis. In such an analysis, a national 'league table' can be compiled to determine which hospitals are better at managing trauma care. One of the problems with the conventional analysis is that key covariates for measuring physiological injury can often be missing. It is also hypothesized that this missingness is not missing at random (NMAR). We describe the methods used to assess the performance of hospitals in a trauma setting and implement the method of weights for generalized linear models to account for the missing covariate data, when we suspect the missing data mechanism is NMAR using a Monte Carlo EM algorithm. Through simulation work and application to the trauma data we demonstrate the affect the missing covariate data can have on the performance of hospitals and how the conclusions we draw from the analysis can differ. We highlight the differences in hospital performance and the ranking of hospitals. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18646254     DOI: 10.1002/sim.3379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  6 in total

1.  Evaluating the validity of multiple imputation for missing physiological data in the national trauma data bank.

Authors:  Lynne Moore; James A Hanley; André Lavoie; Alexis Turgeon
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2009-05

2.  Addressing Missing Data in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS): Implications for the Use of PROMS for Comparing Provider Performance.

Authors:  Manuel Gomes; Nils Gutacker; Chris Bojke; Andrew Street
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Informative presence and observation in routine health data: A review of methodology for clinical risk prediction.

Authors:  Rose Sisk; Lijing Lin; Matthew Sperrin; Jessica K Barrett; Brian Tom; Karla Diaz-Ordaz; Niels Peek; Glen P Martin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Evaluation of probability of survival using trauma and injury severity score method in severe neurotrauma patients.

Authors:  Jung-Ho Moon; Bo-Ra Seo; Jae-Won Jang; Jung-Kil Lee; Hyung-Sik Moon
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2013-07-31

5.  Norwegian survival prediction model in trauma: modelling effects of anatomic injury, acute physiology, age, and co-morbidity.

Authors:  J M Jones; N O Skaga; S Søvik; H M Lossius; T Eken
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.105

6.  Validating performance of TRISS, TARN and NORMIT survival prediction models in a Norwegian trauma population.

Authors:  N O Skaga; T Eken; S Søvik
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 2.105

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.