Steve Lui1, Mishka Terplan, Erica J Smith. 1. Leeds Addiction Unit, University of Leeds, 19 Springfield Mount, Leeds, UK, LS2 9NG. steve.lui@ntlworld.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Excessive alcohol use during pregnancy has been associated with adverse maternal and neonatal effects. It is therefore important to develop and evaluate effective interventions during this important time in a woman's life. To our knowledge there have been no systematic reviews of randomised control trials (RCT) in this population. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in pregnant women enrolled in alcohol treatment programs for improving birth and neonatal outcomes, maternal abstinence and treatment retention. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group's Trial register (December 2007); MEDLINE (1950 to 2007); PsycINFO (1806 to 2007); EMBASE (1974 to 2007); CINAHL (1982 to 2007) SELECTION CRITERIA: We sought to include randomised or quasi-randomised studies comparing any psychosocial intervention versus pharmacological interventions or placebo or non-intervention or another psychosocial intervention for treating alcohol dependence in pregnancy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion in review. Studies were to be assessed using standardized data extraction and quality assessment forms. No suitable trials were identified. MAIN RESULTS: The search strategy identified 958 citations. 17 citations were deemed relevant for full text review, an additional 9 articles were retrieved through hand searching references, for a total of 26 articles. Following full text review no articles met the inclusion criteria. Data extraction and assessment of methodological quality were therefore not possible. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The review question remains unanswered as there were no randomised control trials found relevant to the topic. There is a need for high quality randomised controlled trials to determine the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in pregnant women enrolled in alcohol treatment programs.
BACKGROUND: Excessive alcohol use during pregnancy has been associated with adverse maternal and neonatal effects. It is therefore important to develop and evaluate effective interventions during this important time in a woman's life. To our knowledge there have been no systematic reviews of randomised control trials (RCT) in this population. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in pregnant women enrolled in alcohol treatment programs for improving birth and neonatal outcomes, maternal abstinence and treatment retention. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group's Trial register (December 2007); MEDLINE (1950 to 2007); PsycINFO (1806 to 2007); EMBASE (1974 to 2007); CINAHL (1982 to 2007) SELECTION CRITERIA: We sought to include randomised or quasi-randomised studies comparing any psychosocial intervention versus pharmacological interventions or placebo or non-intervention or another psychosocial intervention for treating alcohol dependence in pregnancy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion in review. Studies were to be assessed using standardized data extraction and quality assessment forms. No suitable trials were identified. MAIN RESULTS: The search strategy identified 958 citations. 17 citations were deemed relevant for full text review, an additional 9 articles were retrieved through hand searching references, for a total of 26 articles. Following full text review no articles met the inclusion criteria. Data extraction and assessment of methodological quality were therefore not possible. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The review question remains unanswered as there were no randomised control trials found relevant to the topic. There is a need for high quality randomised controlled trials to determine the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in pregnant women enrolled in alcohol treatment programs.
Authors: Brenda C Stade; Carol Bailey; Darlene Dzendoletas; Michael Sgro; Therese Dowswell; Daniel Bennett Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2009-04-15
Authors: Jan Klimas; Christopher Fairgrieve; Helen Tobin; Catherine-Anne Field; Clodagh Sm O'Gorman; Liam G Glynn; Eamon Keenan; Jean Saunders; Gerard Bury; Colum Dunne; Walter Cullen Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-12-05
Authors: Maria Teresa Acin; José-Ramón Rueda; Luis Carlos Saiz; Veronica Parent Mathias; Natalia Alzueta; Ivan Solà; Javier Garjón; Juan Erviti Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2020-09-21
Authors: Nicola Heslehurst; Louise Hayes; Daniel Jones; James Newham; Joan Olajide; Louise McLeman; Catherine McParlin; Caroline de Brun; Liane Azevedo Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-05-29 Impact factor: 3.240