Literature DB >> 18645695

The role of quantitative ultrasound in predicting osteoporosis defined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in pre- and postmenopausal women.

C Dane1, B Dane, A Cetin, M Erginbas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were, first, to compare correlations between calcaneal quantitative ultrasound parameters and femoral and spine bone mineral density measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and, second, to analyze the predictive values of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) determinations for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in pre- and postmenopausal women.
METHODS: A total of 351 pre- and postmenopausal women were included in the study. The correlation between QUS and DXA was assessed and the optimal cut-off point in QUS was sought for the diagnosis of osteoporosis from sensitivity and specificity calculations and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves.
RESULTS: The QUS parameters of the postmenopausal group were significantly lower than those of premenopausal women. Significantly lower correlation coefficients between broadband ultrasound attenuation and DXA at the femoral neck and spine were found in premenopausal women (r = 0.44 and 0.38, respectively) compared to postmenopausal women (r = 0.60 and 0.48). The areas under the ROC curves ranged from 0.54 to 0.62 and QUS parameters were shown to be poor at predicting osteoporosis as defined by DXA.
CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that, although DXA and QUS parameters were significantly correlated, QUS parameters cannot predict osteoporosis defined by DXA. Sensitivities and specificities of QUS parameters were not sufficiently high for QUS to be used as an alternative to DXA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18645695     DOI: 10.1080/13697130802178471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Climacteric        ISSN: 1369-7137            Impact factor:   3.005


  9 in total

Review 1.  New perspectives in echographic diagnosis of osteoporosis on hip and spine.

Authors:  Sergio Casciaro; Francesco Conversano; Paola Pisani; Maurizio Muratore
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2015-10-26

2.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry versus quantitative ultrasonography in diagnosing osteoporosis in patients with refractory epilepsy and chronic antiepileptic drug use.

Authors:  Kim Beerhorst; Joost Tan; In Yu Tan; Pauline Verschuure; Albert P Aldenkamp
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.346

Review 3.  Is calcaneal quantitative ultrasound useful as a prescreen stratification tool for osteoporosis?

Authors:  K Thomsen; D B Jepsen; L Matzen; A P Hermann; T Masud; J Ryg
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Effect of age and disease on bone mass in Japanese patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Norio Sugawara; Norio Yasui-Furukori; Takashi Umeda; Shoko Tsuchimine; Akira Fujii; Yasushi Sato; Manabu Saito; Hanako Furukori; Kazuma Danjo; Masashi Matsuzaka; Ippei Takahashi; Sunao Kaneko
Journal:  Ann Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  A Cross-Sectional Study of the Association between Autoantibodies and Qualitative Ultrasound Index of Bone in an Elderly Sample without Clinical Autoimmune Disease.

Authors:  Rosebella A Iseme; Mark McEvoy; Brian Kelly; Linda Agnew; Frederick R Walker; Michael Boyle; John Attia
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.818

6.  Which Method is More Efficient in Determining Osteoporosis, QUS or DEXA?

Authors:  Cem Dane; Banu Dane
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-09-30

7.  Bone mass in schizophrenia and normal populations across different decades of life.

Authors:  Jenn-Huei Renn; Nan-Ping Yang; Ching-Mo Chueh; Chih-Yuan Lin; Tsuo-Hung Lan; Pesus Chou
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 8.  Calcaneal quantitative ultrasound as a determinant of bone health status: what properties of bone does it reflect?

Authors:  Kok-Yong Chin; Soelaiman Ima-Nirwana
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 9.  Bone Mineral Density in Schizophrenia: An Update of Current Meta-Analysis and Literature Review Under Guideline of PRISMA.

Authors:  Ping-Tao Tseng; Yen-Wen Chen; Pin-Yang Yeh; Kun-Yu Tu; Yu-Shian Cheng; Ching-Kuan Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.