BACKGROUND: Induction rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) is largely used in renal allograft recipients at risk for delayed graft function (DGF) and immunologic rejection. The purpose of our study was to characterize risk factors and outcomes associated with DGF when it occurs in recipients undergoing routine rATG induction. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our experience in a predominantly high-risk population receiving modern immunosuppressive regimens. RESULTS: Of 231 deceased-donor transplants, high-risk characteristics included African American race (68%), retransplants (12%), peak panel reactive antibody of atleast 20% (19%), expanded criteria donor kidney (15%), and cold ischemia time exceeding 24 hr (27%). DGF occurred in 29% of patients. rATG was continued to a dose of 7.3 mg/kg in DGF patients and 5 mg/kg in non-DGF patients (P<0.0001). Risk factors for DGF were recipient body mass index greater than 30 kg/m(2) (odds ratio [OR]=1.5, P=0.02), female donor/male recipient pairings (OR=1.5, P=0.033), sirolimus use (OR=1.7, P=0.003), and donor creatinine more than 1.5 mg/dL (OR=1.6, P=0.016). One-year patient survival (99% non-DGF, 91% DGF; P=0.001) and acute rejection incidence through 36 months (11% non-DGF, 22.4% DGF; P=0.025) differed between groups. DGF patients experienced a higher rejection rate during the second and third years posttransplant. Death-censored graft survival was similar throughout 36 months. CONCLUSION: In kidney transplantation with routine rATG induction, DGF was related to size and gender, donor creatinine, and immunosuppressive protocol. Despite low first-year rejection rates, DGF was associated with inferior patient survival. Importantly, patients with DGF continued to be at risk for rejection beyond the first year. Donor and recipient selection impacts short-term outcomes, and induction alone may not confer a long-term advantage without further modification of baseline therapy.
BACKGROUND: Induction rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) is largely used in renal allograft recipients at risk for delayed graft function (DGF) and immunologic rejection. The purpose of our study was to characterize risk factors and outcomes associated with DGF when it occurs in recipients undergoing routine rATG induction. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our experience in a predominantly high-risk population receiving modern immunosuppressive regimens. RESULTS: Of 231 deceased-donor transplants, high-risk characteristics included African American race (68%), retransplants (12%), peak panel reactive antibody of atleast 20% (19%), expanded criteria donor kidney (15%), and cold ischemia time exceeding 24 hr (27%). DGF occurred in 29% of patients. rATG was continued to a dose of 7.3 mg/kg in DGF patients and 5 mg/kg in non-DGF patients (P<0.0001). Risk factors for DGF were recipient body mass index greater than 30 kg/m(2) (odds ratio [OR]=1.5, P=0.02), female donor/male recipient pairings (OR=1.5, P=0.033), sirolimus use (OR=1.7, P=0.003), and donorcreatinine more than 1.5 mg/dL (OR=1.6, P=0.016). One-year patient survival (99% non-DGF, 91% DGF; P=0.001) and acute rejection incidence through 36 months (11% non-DGF, 22.4% DGF; P=0.025) differed between groups. DGF patients experienced a higher rejection rate during the second and third years posttransplant. Death-censored graft survival was similar throughout 36 months. CONCLUSION: In kidney transplantation with routine rATG induction, DGF was related to size and gender, donorcreatinine, and immunosuppressive protocol. Despite low first-year rejection rates, DGF was associated with inferior patient survival. Importantly, patients with DGF continued to be at risk for rejection beyond the first year. Donor and recipient selection impacts short-term outcomes, and induction alone may not confer a long-term advantage without further modification of baseline therapy.
Authors: Jacqueline M Garonzik-Wang; Bonnie E Lonze; Jessica M Ruck; Xun Luo; Allan B Massie; Keith Melancon; James F Burdick; Dorry L Segev; Zhaoli Sun Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2018-12-04 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Babak J Orandi; Nathan T James; Erin C Hall; Kyle J Van Arendonk; Jacqueline M Garonzik-Wang; Natasha Gupta; Robert A Montgomery; Niraj M Desai; Dorry L Segev Journal: Transplantation Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Shruti N Tapiawala; Kathryn J Tinckam; Carl J Cardella; Jeffrey Schiff; Daniel C Cattran; Edward H Cole; S Joseph Kim Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2009-10-29 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Andrea Olmos; John Feiner; Ryutaro Hirose; Sharon Swain; Annabel Blasi; John P Roberts; Claus U Niemann Journal: Prog Transplant Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 1.187
Authors: Sharon R Weeks; Xun Luo; Christine E Haugen; Shane E Ottmann; Ahmet O Gurakar; Fizza F Naqvi; Saleh A Alqahtani; Benjamin Philosophe; Andrew M Cameron; Niraj M Desai; Dorry L Segev; Jacqueline M Garonzik Wang Journal: Transplantation Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 5.385
Authors: Keith Melancon; Shamkant P Mulgaonkar; Carlos Delcoro; Anne Wiland; Kevin McCague; Fuad S Shihab Journal: Transplantation Date: 2013-12-27 Impact factor: 4.939