Literature DB >> 18645190

Assisted movement with enhanced sensation (AMES): coupling motor and sensory to remediate motor deficits in chronic stroke patients.

Paul Cordo1, Helmi Lutsep, Linda Cordo, W Geoffrey Wright, Timothy Cacciatore, Rachel Skoss.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conventional methods of rehabilitation in patients with chronic, severe motor impairments after stroke usually do not lessen paresis.
OBJECTIVE: A novel therapeutic approach (assisted movement with enhanced sensation [AMES]) was employed in a medical device phase I clinical trial to reduce paresis and spasticity and, thereby, to improve motor function.
METHODS: Twenty subjects more than 1 year poststroke with severe motor disability of the upper or lower extremity were studied. A robotic device cycled the ankle or the wrist and fingers at 5 degrees/s through +/-17.5 degrees in flexion and extension while the subject assisted this motion. Feedback of the subject's active torque was displayed on a monitor. Simultaneously, 2 vibrators applied a 60 pps stimulus to the tendons of the lengthening muscles, alternating from flexors to extensors as the joint rotation reversed from extension to flexion, respectively. Subjects treated themselves at home for 30 min/day for 6 months. Every other day prior to treatment, the therapy device performed automated tests of strength and joint positioning. Functional testing was performed prior to enrollment, immediately after completing the protocol, and 6 months later. Functional tests included gait and weight distribution (lower extremity subjects only) and the Stroke Impact Scale.
RESULTS: Most subjects improved on most tests, and gains were sustained for 6 months in most subjects. No safety problems arose.
CONCLUSION: The AMES strategy appears safe and possibly effective in patients with severe chronic impairments. The mechanism underlying these gains is likely to be multifactorial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18645190     DOI: 10.1177/1545968308317437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  27 in total

1.  Effect of a robotic restraint gait training versus robotic conventional gait training on gait parameters in stroke patients.

Authors:  Céline Bonnyaud; Raphael Zory; Julien Boudarham; Didier Pradon; Djamel Bensmail; Nicolas Roche
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Non-pharmaceutical therapies for stroke: mechanisms and clinical implications.

Authors:  Fan Chen; Zhifeng Qi; Yuming Luo; Taylor Hinchliffe; Guanghong Ding; Ying Xia; Xunming Ji
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 11.685

3.  Effects of wrist tendon vibration on arm tracking in people poststroke.

Authors:  Megan O Conrad; Robert A Scheidt; Brian D Schmit
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Motor priming in neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Stoykov; Sangeetha Madhavan
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.649

5.  Design and Development of a Smart Exercise Bike for Motor Rehabilitation in Individuals with Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Hassan Mohammadi-Abdar; Angela L Ridgel; Fred M Discenzo; Kenneth A Loparo
Journal:  IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 5.303

Review 6.  Upper extremity proprioception in healthy aging and stroke populations, and the effects of therapist- and robot-based rehabilitation therapies on proprioceptive function.

Authors:  Charmayne Mary Lee Hughes; Paolo Tommasino; Aamani Budhota; Domenico Campolo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation.

Authors:  Paweł Maciejasz; Jörg Eschweiler; Kurt Gerlach-Hahn; Arne Jansen-Troy; Steffen Leonhardt
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 8.  The effectiveness of proprioceptive training for improving motor function: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joshua E Aman; Naveen Elangovan; I-Ling Yeh; Jürgen Konczak
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 9.  Effectiveness of robot-assisted therapy on ankle rehabilitation--a systematic review.

Authors:  Mingming Zhang; T Claire Davies; Shane Xie
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Home-based Computer Assisted Arm Rehabilitation (hCAAR) robotic device for upper limb exercise after stroke: results of a feasibility study in home setting.

Authors:  Manoj Sivan; Justin Gallagher; Sophie Makower; David Keeling; Bipin Bhakta; Rory J O'Connor; Martin Levesley
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.