Literature DB >> 18641913

Comparison of angled versus AP view radiography for post-operative evaluation of lumbosacral spondylolisthesis: a cadaveric study.

Nabil A Ebraheim1, Jiayong Liu, Satheesh K Ramineni, Haitham Elsamaloty, Alan H Lee, Vishwas Patil, Richard A Yeasting, Huilin Yang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate if angled radiographic views of the L5-S1 junction result in quantitatively better images in patients with lumbosacral spondylolisthesis compared to conventional AP view.
METHODS: Grade I lumbosacral spondylolisthesis was simulated in cadaveric specimens and repaired using pedicle screws and posterolateral bone grafting. Angled view AP radiographs were taken at different angles and analyzed at both grade I spondylolisthesis and complete reduction (to normal).
RESULTS: The results indicated that angled view radiographs provide better visualization of intervertebral disc height, area, and posterolateral bone graft area compared with true AP views. The optimal view was at 40 degrees for grade I spondylolisthesis, and at 25 degrees -35 degrees for complete reduction.
CONCLUSION: In addition to the dynamic radiographs currently used for evaluation of patients post-spondylolisthesis repair, an additional angled view radiograph (at 40 degrees or 25-35 degrees ) is recommended to evaluate intervertebral disc height, intervertebral area, bone graft area, and pedicle screw position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18641913     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-008-0392-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  14 in total

1.  Biomechanics of grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Part 1: in vitro model.

Authors:  N R Crawford; S Cagli; V K Sonntag; C A Dickman
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 2.  Evaluation and surgical treatment of high-grade isthmic dysplastic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Lawrence G Lenke; Keith H Bridwell
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2003

Review 3.  Patient outcomes after lumbar spinal fusions.

Authors:  J A Turner; M Ersek; L Herron; J Haselkorn; D Kent; M A Ciol; R Deyo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-08-19       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Lumbar disc disease with discogenic pain. What surgical treatment is most effective?

Authors:  A Nachemson; T A Zdeblick; J P O'Brien
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Treatment of severe spondylolisthesis by reduction and pedicular fixation. A 4-6-year follow-up study.

Authors:  N Boos; D Marchesi; K Zuber; M Aebi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Reduction of high-grade spondylolisthesis using Edwards instrumentation.

Authors:  S S Hu; D S Bradford; E E Transfeldt; M Cohen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbar spine study group.

Authors:  Peter Fritzell; Olle Hägg; Per Wessberg; Anders Nordwall
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The Cochrane review of surgery for lumbar disc prolapse and degenerative lumbar spondylosis.

Authors:  J N Gibson; I C Grant; G Waddell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Reduction of severe spondylolisthesis. A preliminary report.

Authors:  I B McPhee; J P O'Brien
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1979 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Alar transverse process impingement of the L5 spinal nerve: the far-out syndrome.

Authors:  L L Wiltse; R D Guyer; C W Spencer; W V Glenn; I S Porter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.