Literature DB >> 18641556

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic assessment of tacrolimus in liver-transplant recipients during the early post-transplantation period.

Benoît Blanchet1, Christophe Duvoux, Charlotte E Costentin, Camille Barrault, Bijan Ghaleh, Annie Salvat, Hélène Jouault, Alain Astier, Michel Tod, Anne Hulin.   

Abstract

During the early post-transplantation period, the limitations of monitoring current tacrolimus dose with classic pharmacokinetics (PK) have been demonstrated in liver-transplant recipients. Evaluation of the pharmacodynamics (PD) using calcineurin activity (CNA) has been proposed to optimize tacrolimus dosing. The aim of the present study was to determine the time of maximal inhibition of CNA, to explore the relation between exposure to tacrolimus and CNA, and to analyze its variability. Blood was drawn from 14 patients 0, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 9 hours after tacrolimus intake on post-transplantation days 8, 21, and 90 to measure blood tacrolimus concentrations using the EMIT 2000 assay and CNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Tacrolimus and CNA data were obtained for 33 blood-sample collection sessions and analyzed using a population approach. Three models were built to describe tacrolimus PK, CNA kinetics, and the relationships between the area under the CNA-time curve (AUC12effCNA) and AUC12Tacrolimus or CminTacrolimus. Coagulation factor V and whole/split liver graft were identified as covariates influencing tacrolimus clearance. Indeed, apparent tacrolimus clearance rose by 14% when factor V increased by 10% and was threefold higher in patients with whole-liver grafts. The median maximal inhibition of CNA was reached 4 hours after tacrolimus intake on days 8, 21, and 90 and represented an 18% drop in CNA compared with activity at drug intake. The variability of the PK-PD relationship was minimal when using AUC12Tacrolimus. The large variability of the PD parameters (coefficient of variation was 89%) that linked AUC12effCNA to AUC12Tacrolimus indicates that monitoring tacrolimus concentrations may not be adequate to control CNA. Measuring CNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells 4 hours after tacrolimus intake during the first 3 months after liver transplantation could be a means to improve tacrolimus monitoring and thereby avoid acute graft-rejection episodes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18641556     DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e318178e31b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Drug Monit        ISSN: 0163-4356            Impact factor:   3.681


  8 in total

1.  Significance of trough monitoring for tacrolimus blood concentration and calcineurin activity in adult patients undergoing primary living-donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Ikuko Yano; Satohiro Masuda; Hiroto Egawa; Mitsuhiro Sugimoto; Masahide Fukudo; Yuko Yoshida; Sachiyo Hashi; Atsushi Yoshizawa; Yasuhiro Ogura; Kohei Ogawa; Akira Mori; Toshimi Kaido; Shinji Uemoto; Ken-Ichi Inui
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Pathophysiological idiosyncrasies and pharmacokinetic realities may interfere with tacrolimus dose titration in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Itziar Oteo; John C Lukas; Nerea Leal; Elena Suarez; Andres Valdivieso; Mikel Gastaca; Jorge Ortiz de Urbina; Rosario Calvo
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Determination of the most influential sources of variability in tacrolimus trough blood concentrations in adult liver transplant recipients: a bottom-up approach.

Authors:  Cécile Gérard; Jeanick Stocco; Anne Hulin; Benoit Blanchet; Céline Verstuyft; François Durand; Filomena Conti; Christophe Duvoux; Michel Tod
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Population pharmacokinetic analysis of tacrolimus in the first year after pediatric liver transplantation.

Authors:  V Guy-Viterbo; A Scohy; R K Verbeeck; R Reding; P Wallemacq; Flora Tshinanu Musuamba
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 5.  Population Pharmacokinetic Modelling and Bayesian Estimation of Tacrolimus Exposure: Is this Clinically Useful for Dosage Prediction Yet?

Authors:  Emily Brooks; Susan E Tett; Nicole M Isbel; Christine E Staatz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Toward a robust tool for pharmacokinetic-based personalization of treatment with tacrolimus in solid organ transplantation: A model-based meta-analysis approach.

Authors:  Tom M Nanga; Thao T P Doan; Pierre Marquet; Flora T Musuamba
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  In vitro immune cell monitoring as a guide for long-term immunosuppression in adult liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Eunkyoung Jwa; Shin Hwang; Yong-Jae Kwon; Nayoung Kim; Gi-Won Song; Dong-Hwan Jung; Chul-Soo Ahn; Eunyoung Tak; Deok-Bog Moon; Ki-Hun Kim; Tae-Yong Ha; Gil-Chun Park; Sung-Gyu Lee
Journal:  Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2015-11-30

8.  Pharmacogenetic-Whole blood and intracellular pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic (PG-PK2-PD) relationship of tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Camille Tron; Jean-Baptiste Woillard; Pauline Houssel-Debry; Véronique David; Caroline Jezequel; Michel Rayar; David Balakirouchenane; Benoit Blanchet; Jean Debord; Antoine Petitcollin; Mickaël Roussel; Marie-Clémence Verdier; Eric Bellissant; Florian Lemaitre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.