Literature DB >> 18641553

CYP2D6 and ABCB1 genetic variability: influence on paroxetine plasma level and therapeutic response.

Marianne Gex-Fabry1, Chin B Eap, Beatrice Oneda, Nicola Gervasoni, Jean-Michel Aubry, Guido Bondolfi, Gilles Bertschy.   

Abstract

Paroxetine is characterized by large interindividual pharmacokinetic variability and heterogeneous response patterns. The present study investigates plasma concentration and therapeutic response to paroxetine for the influence of age, sex, and CYP2D6 and ABCB1 polymorphisms, the latter gene encoding for the permeability glycoprotein. Genotyping for CYP2D6 (alleles *3, *4, *5, *6, and *xN) and ABCB1 polymorphisms (61A>G, 2677G>T, and 3435C>T) was performed in 71 depressed patients who started 20 mg paroxetine per day and had plasma concentration measured after 2 weeks at a fixed dose. A dose increase to 30 mg per day was possible starting at week 2. For 63 patients, severity of depression (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) was assessed at weeks 0, 2, and 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter until discontinuation. Persistent response was defined as 50% improvement from baseline score sustained from the first occurrence to study end point. Paroxetine concentration significantly differed between female and male patients (median, 28 versus 16 ng/mL; P = 0.001). Differences were not significant between CYP2D6 heterozygous and homozygous extensive metabolizers (median, 27 versus 22 ng/mL; P = 0.074) and between ABCB1 genotypes (P > 0.10). When considered in a multivariate model, CYP2D6 heterozygous extensive metabolizer phenotype (P = 0.062) and female gender (P = 0.001) predicted 1.3-fold and 1.6-fold higher paroxetine concentration, respectively, but fraction of explained variability was modest (21%). Frequency of persistent response at study end point did not significantly differ according to CYP2D6 heterozygous extensive metabolizer versus homozygous extensive metabolizer phenotype and ABCB1 polymorphisms in univariate analyses. After adjusting for age, sex, paroxetine concentration at week 2, and daily dose at study end point, ABCB1 genotype contributed to improving the model significantly for 61A>G (P = 0.043), but not 2677G>T (P = 0.068) and 3435C>T (P = 0.11). None of two poor metabolizers and four ultrarapid metabolizers showed persistent response to paroxetine. The hypothesis that permeability glycoprotein activity might be a relevant predictor of therapeutic response deserves to be further investigated while controlling for pharmacokinetic variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18641553     DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e31817d6f5d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Drug Monit        ISSN: 0163-4356            Impact factor:   3.681


  29 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacogenetics of antidepressant response.

Authors:  Stefano Porcelli; Antonio Drago; Chiara Fabbri; Sara Gibiino; Raffaella Calati; Alessandro Serretti
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.186

Review 2.  Reliability of In Vitro and In Vivo Methods for Predicting the Effect of P-Glycoprotein on the Delivery of Antidepressants to the Brain.

Authors:  Yi Zheng; Xijing Chen; Leslie Z Benet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  The promise and reality of pharmacogenetics in psychiatry.

Authors:  Peter P Zandi; Jennifer T Judy
Journal:  Psychiatr Clin North Am       Date:  2010-03

Review 4.  Pharmacogenetics of major depressive disorder: top genes and pathways toward clinical applications.

Authors:  Chiara Fabbri; Alessandro Serretti
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 5.  Pharmacogenetics and Imaging-Pharmacogenetics of Antidepressant Response: Towards Translational Strategies.

Authors:  Tristram A Lett; Henrik Walter; Eva J Brandl
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 6.  Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guideline for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 Genotypes and Dosing of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors.

Authors:  J K Hicks; J R Bishop; K Sangkuhl; D J Müller; Y Ji; S G Leckband; J S Leeder; R L Graham; D L Chiulli; A LLerena; T C Skaar; S A Scott; J C Stingl; T E Klein; K E Caudle; A Gaedigk
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  A combined high CYP2D6-CYP2C19 metabolic capacity is associated with the severity of suicide attempt as measured by objective circumstances.

Authors:  E Peñas-Lledó; S Guillaume; M E G Naranjo; A Delgado; I Jaussent; H Blasco-Fontecilla; P Courtet; A LLerena
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.550

8.  Population pharmacokinetic approach to evaluate the effect of CYP2D6, CYP3A, ABCB1, POR and NR1I2 genotypes on donepezil clearance.

Authors:  Muriel Noetzli; Monia Guidi; Karsten Ebbing; Stephan Eyer; Laurence Wilhelm; Agnès Michon; Valérie Thomazic; Ioana Stancu; Abdel-Messieh Alnawaqil; Christophe Bula; Serge Zumbach; Michel Gaillard; Panteleimon Giannakopoulos; Armin von Gunten; Chantal Csajka; Chin B Eap
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  ABCB1 (MDR1) predicts remission on P-gp substrates in chronic depression.

Authors:  A Ray; L Tennakoon; J Keller; J E Sarginson; H S Ryan; G M Murphy; L C Lazzeroni; M H Trivedi; J H Kocsis; C DeBattista; A F Schatzberg
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.550

10.  P-glycoprotein inhibition increases the brain distribution and antidepressant-like activity of escitalopram in rodents.

Authors:  Fionn E O'Brien; Richard M O'Connor; Gerard Clarke; Timothy G Dinan; Brendan T Griffin; John F Cryan
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 7.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.