Literature DB >> 18641532

Investigation of pharyngeal swallowing function using high-resolution manometry.

Kenji Takasaki1, Hiroshi Umeki, Kaori Enatsu, Fujinobu Tanaka, Noriyuki Sakihama, Hidetaka Kumagami, Haruo Takahashi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of a novel high-resolution manometry system, and to establish normal values of swallowing pressures along the velopharynx and upper esophagus. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective study.
METHODS: Thirty-three asymptomatic adult Japanese controls were studied. A solid-state high-resolution manometry assembly with 36 circumferential sensors spaced 1 cm apart was positioned to record pressures during swallowing from the velopharynx to the upper esophagus. The maximum values of the swallowing (dry and 5 mL of water) pressures at velopharynx, meso-hypopharynx, and at the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) were measured. The resting UES pressure, the length of the part in the cervical esophagus showing the resting UES pressure, and the distances from the nostril to the above-mentioned points of pressure measurement were also measured.
RESULTS: The maximum value of dry and water swallowing pressures at the velopharynx, meso-hypopharynx and UES, and the distances from the nasal vestibulum to each point in men were 141.1 +/- 73.5 (mm Hg, mean +/- standard deviation) and 162.7 +/- 94.9, 175.3 +/- 59.7 and 182.9 +/- 83.6, 172.7 +/- 73.8 and 236.1 +/- 78.9, and 10.0 +/- 1.3 (cm) and 10.1 +/- 1.4, 14.1 +/- 1.5 and 14.4 +/- 1.3, 17.9 +/- 1.7 and 18.0 +/- 1.4, respectively. Those in women were 118.9 +/- 38.0 (mm Hg) and 124.7 +/- 43.4, 165.9 +/- 41.5 and 167.3 +/- 65.0, 149.2 +/- 68.7 and 243.7 +/- 87.4, and 9.5 +/- 1.2 (cm) and 9.4 +/- 1.2, 13.0 +/- 1.5 and 12.8 +/- 1.4, 15.8 +/- 1.5 and 16.0 +/- 1.3, respectively. The maximum value of resting UES pressure, the length of the part in the cervical esophagus showing the resting UES pressure and the distance from the nostril to the mid-point of the width of the resting UES pressure in men and in women were 70.2 +/- 30.0 mm Hg, 4.0 +/- 0.7 cm, 19.1 +/- 1.3 cm, and 61.8 +/- 26.7 mm Hg, 3.6 +/- 0.6 cm, 17.0 +/- 1.2 cm, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The present study provides anatomical and physiological information about normal swallowing along the velopharynx and upper esophagus, which will be an aid to the future clinical and investigative studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18641532     DOI: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31817dfd02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  29 in total

1.  [High-resolution manometry of the upper esophageal sphincter].

Authors:  S Meyer; M Jungheim; M Ptok
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  High-resolution manometry of pharyngeal swallow pressure events associated with head turn and chin tuck.

Authors:  Timothy M McCulloch; Matthew R Hoffman; Michelle R Ciucci
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.547

3.  Propagation Curve and Velocity of Swallowing Pressure in Healthy Young Adults.

Authors:  Keigo Matsubara; Yoshihiko Kumai; Yasuhiro Samejima; Eiji Yumoto
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Anatomophysiology of the pharyngo-upper esophageal area in light of high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  Luciana C Silva; Fernando A M Herbella; Luciano R Neves; Fernando P P Vicentine; Sebastião P Neto; Marco G Patti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Comparison of unidirectional and circumferential manometric measures within the pharyngoesophageal segment: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Esther Guiu Hernandez; Kristin Gozdzikowska; Richard Jones; Maggie-Lee Huckabee
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  Pulsion Diverticulum of the Oesophagus: More than just an Out Pouch.

Authors:  Dhiraj John Sonbare
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 0.656

7.  The value of high-resolution manometry in the assessment of the resting characteristics of the lower esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  Shahin Ayazi; Jeffrey A Hagen; Joerg Zehetner; Oliver Ross; Calvin Wu; Arzu Oezcelik; Emmanuele Abate; Helen J Sohn; Farzaneh Banki; John C Lipham; Steven R DeMeester; Tom R Demeester
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Pharyngeal Pressure and Timing During Bolus Transit.

Authors:  Chelsea C Walczak; Corinne A Jones; Timothy M McCulloch
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.438

9.  High-Resolution Manometry Evaluation of the Pharynx and Upper Esophageal Sphincter Motility in Patients with Achalasia.

Authors:  Mariano A Menezes; Fernando A M Herbella; Marco G Patti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Implementation of high-resolution manometry in the clinical practice of speech language pathology.

Authors:  Molly A Knigge; Susan Thibeault; Timothy M McCulloch
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.438

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.