PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of clinical pathway (CP) implementation in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) has had on patient care and clinical evolution after discharge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-six patients were included in 2 groups: first group was composed of patients operated since the new technique (LRP) was used until the CP was implemented (26 patients operated in 2002) and, second group, with 60 patients, followed the CP during 2004 and 2005. RESULTS: The operative time was reduced from 377.7 to 172.3 minutes after the CP implementation. The duration of bladder catheterization decreased by more than 10 days (from 26.17 to 15.85 days) and that of thromboprophylaxis was reduced from 6.44 to 3.38 days. No difference was found in the rate of complications in the first month after surgery, nor was there any difference in the rate of occurrence of erectile dysfunction, incontinence, and biochemical recurrence during the first year after surgery. CONCLUSION: After the implementation of the CP, there have been better results in patient care, such as reduction in the duration of catheterization and thromboprophylaxis. In comparison with other studies, we observed a clear reduction in length of stay and operative time. However, there is still room for improvement in reducing the duration of catheterization.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of clinical pathway (CP) implementation in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) has had on patient care and clinical evolution after discharge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-six patients were included in 2 groups: first group was composed of patients operated since the new technique (LRP) was used until the CP was implemented (26 patients operated in 2002) and, second group, with 60 patients, followed the CP during 2004 and 2005. RESULTS: The operative time was reduced from 377.7 to 172.3 minutes after the CP implementation. The duration of bladder catheterization decreased by more than 10 days (from 26.17 to 15.85 days) and that of thromboprophylaxis was reduced from 6.44 to 3.38 days. No difference was found in the rate of complications in the first month after surgery, nor was there any difference in the rate of occurrence of erectile dysfunction, incontinence, and biochemical recurrence during the first year after surgery. CONCLUSION: After the implementation of the CP, there have been better results in patient care, such as reduction in the duration of catheterization and thromboprophylaxis. In comparison with other studies, we observed a clear reduction in length of stay and operative time. However, there is still room for improvement in reducing the duration of catheterization.
Authors: Hiba Abou-Haidar; Samuel Abourbih; David Braganza; Talal Al Qaoud; Lawrence Lee; Franco Carli; Deborah Watson; Armen G Aprikian; Simon Tanguay; Liane S Feldman; Wassim Kassouf Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Sergio Alonso Y Gregorio; Juan Gómez Rivas; Susana Sánchez Molina; Angel Tabernero Gómez; Jesús Cisneros Ledo; Jesús Díez Sebastián; Jesús Javier de la Peña Barthel Journal: Cent European J Urol Date: 2014-08-18