Literature DB >> 1864102

Outcome of assessments for occupational asthma.

S M Tarlo1, I Broder.   

Abstract

Among 154 referrals to a university hospital clinic for assessment of possible occupational asthma, the feasibility and results of different investigations were assessed using a consistent approach to all patients. A positive skin test to a workplace allergen (14 percent of all subjects), positive peak flow workplace changes (12 percent), improvement in methacholine response on holiday (9 percent), and/or positive specific challenge testing (14 percent) supported the diagnosis of occupational asthma in 61 subjects (39 percent of the total referrals). Fifty-one of these were related to a workplace sensitizer and ten to a presumed irritant. Occupational asthma was excluded in 48 subjects (31 percent) who had normal methacholine responsiveness within 24 hours of work (22 percent of the 154 subjects), peak flow readings no worse at work than on holidays (14 percent of the total referrals) and/or negative specific challenge testing (10 percent of the total referrals). Insufficient information could be obtained for a diagnosis in the remaining 45 subjects (28 percent). No single investigation was considered diagnostic in this study, as each could be positive or negative for other reasons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1864102     DOI: 10.1378/chest.100.2.329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  8 in total

1.  A case series of 71 patients referred to a hospital-based occupational and environmental medicine clinic for occupational asthma.

Authors:  S Wheeler; L Rosenstock; S Barnhart
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-02

2.  Serial nasal peak expiratory flow measurements in woodwork teachers.

Authors:  M Ahman; E Söderman
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  A new risk of occupational disease: allergic asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis in persons working with beneficial arthropods.

Authors:  C Cipolla; G Lugo; C Sassi; R Bonfiglioli; S Maini; M G Tommasini; G B Raffi
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 4.  Evidence based guidelines for the prevention, identification, and management of occupational asthma.

Authors:  P J Nicholson; P Cullinan; A J Newman Taylor; P S Burge; C Boyle
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Outcome determinants for isocyanate induced occupational asthma among compensation claimants.

Authors:  S M Tarlo; D Banks; G Liss; I Broder
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Early incidence of occupational asthma among young bakers, pastry-makers and hairdressers: design of a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Thomas Rémen; Vincent Coevoet; Dovi-Stéphanie Acouetey; Jean-Louis Guéant; Rosa-Maria Guéant-Rodriguez; Christophe Paris; Denis Zmirou-Navier
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Pulmonary Function Testing in Work-Related Asthma: An Overview from Spirometry to Specific Inhalation Challenge.

Authors:  Mathias Poussel; Isabelle Thaon; Emmanuelle Penven; Angelica I Tiotiu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Diagnostic approach in cases with suspected work-related asthma.

Authors:  Tor B Aasen; P Sherwood Burge; Paul K Henneberger; Vivi Schlünssen; Xaver Baur
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.646

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.